I want to buy new speakers for 50,000 and see it used for 30,000, what should I do?

The point I was trying to make was the difficulty of purchasing extremely expensive equipment which should be priced a lot less. 

That's what this whole thread was all about?  LOL!

Buy used from a reputable dealer.  The used are often last years demo.  Mine has credited me the full value of the prior purchase toward the newer speakers.  As a licensed dealer warranty applies.  And even if he doesn’t carry a line he stands behind the purchase.  I’ve gotten to demo new equipment in my own system and he sets up the purchase.  Turntable(reference) , phono preamp and speakers. Didn’t matter if it was a 8k purchase or a 40k purchase

knownwho you’re buying from and build on that relationship. 

@emergingsoul 

Easy to see why you're not married. You basically use this forum to brag that you're considering $50,000 speakers and all the reasons you can think of why not to buy them. Please  be considerate by not wasting our time.

brag?  Have you ever visited the virtual Displays of systems. This forum feature is probably the best in the world for showcasing peoples individual systems.  It's absolutely remarkable.  I can only imagine all those amazing systems that are not posted to this site.   Truly inspirational what people do in their homes.  

@unreceivedogma wrote:

It seems to me, judging from some of his comments in the thread, that he is trying to coax a discussion about the political economy of audio. Not in so many words, but that’s sort of it in a nutshell and that’s why I responded, because that’s an issue for me as well. Not the issue, an issue. And why I made it more explicit.

... imo the people who are saying he is not “real”, just don’t want to pursue what he is hinting at. Which is fine, but then why not just ignore it? Theres an unconscious thing going on here.

Agreed, and well put.

Essentially, if one lists the total price of the setup he/she owns that has been acquired with mostly used components and chooses to go by new retail prices, it rubs some people the wrong way because it’s not the price that reflects what they were bought for by the latest buyer. And yet the product is the same but simply changed hands on its way to the current owner, and if well-kept and used sensibly (and not excessive in age) will do its job just as well - on top of the likelihood of it being properly run-in.

Matters can be made worse or credibility lessened - that is, in the mind of the individual who insists on buying only new, expensive products, and as a rule lets price dictate quality - when a different, potentially lesser known brand from a different segment at a lower price is deemed the equal or (not least) better sounding equivalent compared to a range of more expensive alternatives, because it disrupts the saying that "you get what pay for" as well as the overall narrative of what constitutes audiophilia and the type of products used here.

Maybe, at the core of things, the issue appears to be that one who has less of a financial basis isn’t really "allowed" to have the same sonic experience as the more wealthy individual; if so the one with the lower income is essentially cheating or even lying and must be belittled for having bought used and/or (it is probably assumed) dubious, ill-regarded products. Meaning: he isn’t part of the club but just a poor(er) sap who couldn’t get by a claimed, good sound any other way.

If that sounds a bit dramatic and rather exaggerated, it likely is, and yet the subtlety of these mechanisms shouldn’t be ignored and underestimated; they’re right there alright, and you needn’t look too hard to see them for what they are.