I agree with tomic601. The physics is real. I biwired Martin Logan Request, very resolving speakers; biwire one and not the other and moving from speaker to speaker the improved resolution (Norah Jones voice emerging more distinctly from the mix) was very apparent, even to the wife! Haha! There is a reason higher end speakers are biwireable (beyond just a gimmick to make money.) I feel sorry for the denialists, they don't know what they are missing.
Biwiring make any sense?
I am on the verge of adding new floor standers to my setup as my room has enlarged. Options being considered are KEF R7 Metas and PSAudio Aspen FR10's. Both have biwireable terminals, the KEF has a jumper switch and the PS has jumper wires to bridge the terminals. The other option from dealing with the jumpers is to biwire the speakers. In this case I could run a banana and a spade off each output terminal. Is this even worth considering? Biamping is not something I'm interested in, as I already am running off an integrated amp. I had a pair of BassZillas before, each one of which had 3 sets of terminals, the top 2 being biwired, but that's a different deal (I don't have those cables anymore). Speaker comments would be welcome too. Amp is PSAudio Spectral Strata w/150 watts into 4 ohms.
- ...
- 65 posts total
@84xfirez-51 , I am not saying that is not correct, because I don’t know; and I am not saying it wouldn’t work, because if the runs of cable are identical pairs I see no reason it wouldn’t work; I am just saying that I was always under the impression that speaker cables were routed from amp binding posts to speaker binding posts as per usual, and then another speaker cable came out of the same amp binding posts and went to the same speaker but connected to the other (unused) binding posts. But no biggy, if it works it works. As I typed, assuming all the cable runs are identical, I cannot see how it would make any difference which method you used. With the cables I was using, I would have been unable to do it the second way. I was using one grade of Kimber Kable to hook to my tweeter binding posts, and then I was using the next grade up of Kimber Kable to hook to my woofer/midrange driver binding posts. Thinking about it, I guess I could have used the smaller grade of Kimber for the grounds on both sides, but still, I had one of the pairs made with spades on the ends for the speakers and bananas on the amp end, therefore I wouldn’t have to double any of the spades up on top of each other at the amp end. (In other words, at the amp, the woofer pair of cables was connected via spades, and then the tweeter pair of cables was connected to the amp via bananas. |
True biwiring was made if you wires from the internal Xover had a separate wire from the Xover to the loudspeaker terminal, upgrading many speakers most biwiring on the terminals is fake ,a selling point get rid ofthe stock jumpers if they are metal straps pure junk. You want agood quality wire and quality connectors copper is far better then cheap Brass which most are unless you have say WBT connectors ,I have found if you connect the Speaker cables to the bottom you get a bit more if-you |
I posted a link to an image for bi-wiring. Yes, my cables were the same for each pair. Using the same cables I had for many years, I immediately noted the difference and improvement listening to music I have been very familiar w like Famous Blue Raincoat - Jennifer Warnes Brothers in Arms - Dire Straits That is what compelled me to try newer tech cables like the Shunyata Venoms. I have Venoms for my interconncts. |
I saw your link, @84xfirez-51 , and that was what I based my reply on. I am pretty sure I understand what you reconfigured your biwire to. |
- 65 posts total