2. digital
  3. 191150-21

Six DAC Comparison

I am in the middle of comparing the sound of six different DACs in my system. I own them all (I know weird) but one of them is still within a trial/return timeframe.

Not to share specific comparisons today, but a couple of observations so far are that first, they all definitely sound different from each other. On one hand, they all sound pretty good and play what is fed to them without significant flaws but on the other hand there are definite sonic differences that make it easy to understand how a person might like the sound of some of them while not liking others.

Second, raises the observation that most of them must be doing something to shape the sound in the manner the designer intended since one of the DACs, a Benchmark DAC3 HGA, was described by John Atkinson of Stereophile as providing "state-of-the-art measured performance." In the review, JA closed the measurements section by writing, "All I can say is "Wow!" I have also owned the Tambaqui (not in my current comparison), which also measured well ("The Mola Mola Tambaqui offers state-of-the-digital-art measured performance." - JA). The Benchmark reminds me sonically of the Tambaqui, both of which are excellent sounding DACs.

My point is that if the Benchmark is providing "state-of-the-art measured performance," then one could reasonably presume that the other five DACs, which sound different from the Benchmark, do not share similar ’state-of-the-art" measurements and are doing something to subtly or not so subtly alter the sound. Whether a person likes what they hear is a different issue.

mitch2
bassdude
490 posts
 

This is a pedantic discussion of aspects of sound reproduction that is almost totally irrelevant to how "lifelike" a DAC or system sounds.  The ASR "BS" and "measurements" bear almost no relationship to how "lifelike" and "real" a DAC or system sounds, or how "musical" it sounds - there are many more aspects of the sound produced that are not subject to the "metrics."  

It is far, far more meaningful to focus on how a DAC and system sounds to the specific listener, and on the system matching / synergies and how "lifelike" it sounds.  In fact, the harmonics and distortion a DAC or system produces often contributes to the how "lifelike" and musical the sound is (e.g. as with tube components and systems, or ladder DAC's, etc.).   

Move on to those other threads that focus on those aspects and forget the ASR "BS" and measurements - they are irrelevant!

audioman58's avatar
audioman58
4,130 posts
 

Each dac will have something different to offer ,many times measured performance 

doesnot guarantee better sound  like other forums like ASR 

totally off eye a $700 topping dac measures better then many but doesnot have much life more neutral  and on not-so good recordings far worse.

mitch2 OP
3,965 posts
 

@bassdude - Please take your playbook, your mission and your own advice and, "move on to those other threads."

This thread has nothing to do with ASR, measurements only, or any of the other crap people here use to drive a wedge.  The discussion was about one DAC out of six being compared that happens to have the combination of good measurements, a low price, and positive comments from a variety of reviewers.  I found it to sound pretty good in my own system, even compared to the other five DACs.  The Tambaqui exhibits good measurements too and has many who appreciate the sound (although it does cost quite a bit).  I sold mine because I didn't find it quite as musical in my system as other DACs I own.  Please go find a Tambaqui thread to inhabit or start your own.

jayctoy's avatar
jayctoy
4,021 posts
 

Audioman58 agreed 100%. 

gkr7007's avatar
gkr7007
150 posts
 

The best value piece of the bunch is tge new Aero at 4 grand....and, depending on your taste, maybe the best sounding.  A friend has the Aero and uses NOS 6SN7'S and it sounds very very nice.  He actually had a Benchmark and, for him, it was no contest.  It's an excellent piece.   Best of luck.

More to discover