Separates vs Integrated

SPL https://pt.audio/2022/11/27/spl-elector-analog-preamplifier-review/

If money is no object, Separates rock. However, I used to run separates, one preamp and two amps, and found that all of the interconnects add up. I switched to a McIntosh MA 12000 and since I only needed one interconnect from my Lumin T2 streamer, I was able to go with AQ Dragons. 

My dealer wants me to go with the new HiFi Rose streamer and still to come out, power supply for it, But I am curious about the 432 Evo. 

All kinds of I have, you should get this or that brand type added with we sell this type of bias crap heaped in. Useless information and or post. Try naming a company that makes both integrated and separates in the same value range that boast their integrates are better. No sharing parts is better period ! 

In my experience, separates will usually prevail b/c they're further up the food chain then most integrateds and are made from better parts and engineering.  Having said that, the latest few generations of dual mono integrates are getting really close.  The one box, fewer cables can be very appealing and deliver superior bang for the buck.

I own a Hegel H590 and did an inhouse side by side of the H600 vs my unit.  The H600 is just a bit better and might give your current rig a run for the money. 

If you could reach a little higher the Gryphon Diablo integrated that just came out is supposed to be on another level and would be worth a listen.  Good luck and cheers.

Coda CSiB is a really good integrated. I had the V1 version which is 150/300/600w per channel into 8/4/2. The CSiB drove my Wilson Sabrina no issues.

I am using Boulder 866 now. I would say both amps are excellent and it comes down to personal preference and what works best with your setup.
Coda is more forward but in a good way without being harsh, it has really nice crystal clear mids and sweet highs with fast bass. Boulder is slightly bigger and warmer sounding and sets everything a bit further back into the soundstage.