Open baffle speakers


Open baffle speakers design is the simplest , to get bass response similar to other design , like ported, the baffle size must be huge to avoid low frequency degradations . Tipical size the baffle   width 10-20"  got weak  bass performance.   I am wondering how open baffle speakers design became so popular ?

128x128bache

Hi all!

I've tried many speakers etc including B&W Matrix 3s, Harbeth SLH5 Super 40th anniversary, Quad ESL63's and finally built a pair of "Compact Baffles" designed by Terry from Ladolce Audio and James from ABX Audiophiles and am gobsmacked with the result.

My Audio friends are stunned and confused as they can't understand how they can sound soooo good.

The bass is best I've ever heard in a home situation. It is clean, fast, tight, deep and loud! 

I no longer need my pair of RSL subs. First speakers I've had that don't need SUB support. 

These speakers use slot loading to simplify crossover parts and extend the bass. 

Compression tweeter through 15 inch coaxial and 18 Inch Bass driver. 

Dubious? Just look up ABX Audio or Ladolce Audio on Google for more info or sign up to Discord for all the plans and driver suggestions.

It was my first furniture type woodworking speaker project.

Hope you enjoy the process as much as I did.

Cheers! Tony. 

Oh almost forgot. These "Compact Baffles" are the most holographic best imaging speakers I've ever had! 

My experiences with open baffle speakers started with the Caintuck speaker that I first observed on the Decware site, which I built and bought a pair of the least expensive Lii audio 6 inch speakers for. I wasn’t expecting much and was shocked how appealing they were to me, I later bought a pair of the F15s Which I put in a bit larger baffle and was further pleased. I had read Nelson Pass saying that he was rather enjoying open baffle speakers with no crossovers full range. That is what these were and they are surprisingly enjoyable. Lots of speed and leading edge definition  And much less sensitive to sweet spot problems. They par nicely with subwoofers, but also hold their own without them. I think it is because they deliver such nice cues regarding the attack and transient qualities of the music that your mind fills in some of the missing base performance. I’ve also done a little experimenting digitally, equalizing them but tend to come back to liking their performance unaided, warts and all. Needless to say these are great speakers for small amplifiers both tube and solid-state. They are efficient and present a very easy to drive load. Maybe that is part of what makes them appealing. 

I never even considered that imaging would be a problem with open baffle speakers.  They do a good job when correctly placed, as do most other types of speakers.  In many respects, they are not much different from panel speakers, like Maggies, which also have a dipole radiation pattern that result in bass cancellation and substantial sound coming from the back.  If the back wave is sufficiently delayed in time reaching the listeners ear vis-a-vis the front wave, the ear/brain hears it as reverberation and not a confusing signal about the location of the original sound source.  Added reverb is generally not a bad thing and some people have spent a lot to generate additional reverb to supplement what is in the recording.

 

My only experience was owning Alon V MkIIs, which were like the Qualio IQ - sealed box woofer under an open baffle with mid and tweeter. I never got used to the sound and sold them after a couple of years to happily return to box speakers. The open baffle sound was just too diffuse sounding for me.