Bidat vs. Perfecwave MSB Playback Design


Ok, so here goes. I love my Museatex Bidat. It is not going ANYWHERE. The rub comes in that I want to be able to access high res files. All my files are on HDD in AIFF format. I am torn between the Playback Design dac, the Perfect Wave and the MSB Platinum Dac 3. The problem is I have never had a chance to hear, let alone compare any of the 3 high res capable dacs mentioned. I can not afford to purchase all 3 simultaneously to do a head to head comparison. I wanted to know if anyone has compared any of these dacs to a Bidat. The Bidat (currently and for the last 10 years) has been my reference digital source. I have noticed that when most people compare new dacs they will say things like "the bottom was so much tighter" or "everything is so trasnparent". The Bidat is just "Right"; anyone who has heard the unit will immediately know to what I am referring.
That certain unmistakable ineffiable quality which sounds like ral music; it makes you believe (even if temporarily) that Jane Monheit is in your living room singing directly to you. I have had Wadia and a slew of others and they are all fine machines, but I need the unit I am looking for to have that certain 'life' quality which makes you forget about all the reviews, what other people think and just reside in that special place in yourself where all is right.

Ok, now that I've waxed poetic, any opinions would be greatly apprecited :)

Thanks,

Don
PS>the Dynavox Dynastation II was the ONLY other digital source that I have owned or heard to compete with the Bidat bu alas it was a CD player only thus I got rid of it.
audiofun
I understand. I am very hard on preamps and I have only found a couple that I have found memories of. Best I ever heard period was my TRL pre, the Joule was ok, I hated my Sim Audio P5...etc. I want to try the Wyred 4Sound unit, a trusted buddy thought it was as good as his Esoteric C03, which he ended up selling. Lots of choices out there and it's all fun!
I'm using the conrad-johnson CT5 right now after the VTL 5.5...tubes are amazing but some people are doing amazing things in solid state.
I thought I would chime in on the preamp debate. I can understand how Vhiner might experience better sound using a tube preamp with the Biddat if in fact the volume control is flawed on the Biddat. On the other hand, a preamp in the playback chain is inefficient (all things being equal). Since most DACs produce line output (if they have no volume control). The preamp is then only responsible for volume attentuation and passing the signal to the amplifier. IF. and this is a big if... A Dac was produced with a "high" quality volume attenuator similar to those in the best preamps, then and only then I suspect having a preamp in the chain would degrade the sound. Any other explanation, is that the tube preamp adds a little "color" to the line out signal with which you might prefer. I myself, strive for neutrality and only hope the playback is honest to the recording. Not adding or subtracting anything from it. I think alot of people prefer preamps in the playback chain, simply as a result of their music tastes and what color the preamp is adding to the music. If that works for you, great. It's all about musical enjoyment in the end, regardless of how you got there.

My understanding of the MSB DAC III is that alot of engineering effort was put into it's volume control. My hope is that it rivals the volume control found in the best preamps. If it does. I am sold. Looking forward to your review Audiofun.
I will keep everyone posted. I have a lot of audio related testing planned for 2010.
Njedi,

I think your analysis of the preamp issue is dead on and makes perfect sense. There's no doubt that tubes are a "flavor" and the key is HOW a volume output control on DACs is designed. I've heard that using MSB's proprietary digital interface helps get the best sound out of their gear. Audiofun's testing this year should be very interesting!