Thiel Owners

cawgijoe,

I installed PowerPlene 1.2 speakers in a conventional 2x4 wall cavity (studs 16" o.c.) without problem, though my sheetrock was 5/8" thick, not 1/2". Long dimension of the speakers are parallel to the studs. I don't think the additional 1/8" is a big deal but YMMV. They've been installed since 2016 without problem.

Good luck!

rojacob,

Speakers will be horizontal. I went over and measured today. I will have 1/8 inch clearance. So it will work. 
Need to figure out how to post pics.

Thanks!

@tomthiel thats unfortunate - thanks for looking!

@prof regarding 2.7 vs 3.7 is the latter that much better in the bass?  I'm looking at either upgrading to 3.7 or building custom subs.  This will be to fill out the bottom in large scale orchestra and organ works.

@solobone22 

Ironically, that’s a question. I sought to answer myself, but I’m not sure I ever truly answered.

When I had both the  3.7 and 2.7 at the same time, I found it they were very close in terms of the sense of bass depth.  Although I could tell that 3.7 went a tiny bit lower, and had a slightly bigger sense of overall scale.

After I sold the 3.7 s,  I was generally fine with the frequency range of the 2.7, but I finally did try and integrate a couple of subwoofers.  I had two JL Audio 110E subs, a terrific CR1 crossover, and a Dspeaker Anti mode for room correction in the bass.

The difference was actually pretty subtle subjectively in terms of extending the bass  and what it added to the sound.  I would say, yeah, it added, perhaps a bit more scale and dimensionality.  But I don’t really I didn’t like this slight change the characteristics that the subwoofers brought to the overall sound.  Plus I found at least my room 2.7 sounded more punchy without the subwoofers.  So I sold them.

Ultimately, if you upgrade to the 3.7s what I think you’ll get is a little more reach in the bottom, but not a lot.  But also some greater scale to the sound in terms of imaging and sound staging, and slightly more refinement overall to the sound.  The bass is a bit more linear, The mid range and highs a bit more suave and refined, and the 3.7 speakers disappear a little bit better.   

I hope that’s helpful. 

Hi,

I used to have a pretty great analog system driving a pair of 3.6s. I was powering them with 300 watts SS. I had to get rid of that system, except the speakers of course. In the meantime I was listening to a pair of 1.6 driven by a Conrad Johnson Classic 60se, a tube amp. It was a glorious match. I know the philosophy was tube preamp and SS amp, but I now believe it is the amp, the last thing in the chain, that "voices" the speaker. l have read that tube watts are entirely different than SS watts, but I thought I'd ask the gurus to weigh in.

How many tube watts do I need to drive 3.6, and later 6s, to very loud levels. Garage is 20 x 20 ft with 8-foot ceilings.