Even on the same tube type, factories tweaked their construction from year to year. Usually to save money. Some of these changes are visible, others may not be?
Anyways, we (I mean the collective "we" here, including me) probably let our audiophile nervosa run rampant too much. I've used pairs a tubes a few years apart with different internal construction.
Example 1: GE 3-mica black plate 5751 from the 1950s, but one from 1953 with the "silver clips" and the other not (from a few years later) - and honestly it sounded great (Rogue Apollo tube monos). The "silver clips" was the better tube but enough of its magic came through without an obvious asymmetry here. Of course I ended up getting more (many more) of the silver clips version for symmetry and peace of mind anymore. But if you've got a factory match, "similar" construction, and a good electrical match, it should be fine.
Example 2: Brent Jesse might even slip you a slightly construction mismatch if you're not careful. I got a pair of Mazda 12AX7 from him, one with shiny silver plates (the typical kind for this version) and one with matte silver plates and a different hole arrangement. They actually sound just as good as any other pair of shiny plates I've got, so I kept them.
Example 3: I also like the fabled Tung Sol round plate black glass 6SN7, but it's hard to find tubes that are strong. The heaters on these also commonly die (even if they tested good). So I've ended up now with a pair in my amp where one has the oval-mica construction and the other has round mica. Sounds great, no problems!