Streaming Qobuz almost does seem too good to be true — it’s awesome! Rather than being overwhelmed or dumbed down to music as the article implies, I find incredible new music across many genres on a daily basis I would’ve likely never otherwise heard. My music vocabulary/collection has grown more over the past five years than it has over the prior two decades. I fail to see how that’s bad in any way whatsoever. It’s not the tool that’s to blame, whether that be Spotify or any other streaming service, but rather how the listener decides to use it. People who care about music will find it to be a gold mine and a revelation, and people aren’t as serious about music and who just want generic background music can be happy with that. This article’s assertion that streaming music is a problem for listeners is a stretch IMHO. How artists get paid is another issue, but it is true that unknown artists have many more platforms today to get noticed than they ever had in the past, so as usual there are trade offs and streaming will continue to evolve. All I know is that this is the best time I’ve ever had in my 40+ years as an audiophile, and it’s solely due to the convenience and new music discovery through streaming.
Streaming Leads to Brain Rot
The linked article doesn't outright say that, but the implication is clear. "Spotify Syndrome" is a threat to music lovers everywhere.
The promise of unlimited access to millions and millions of songs for less than the price of a single CD. When it sounds too good to be true it's because it probably is too good to be true.
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2024/12/30/mood-machine-liz-pelly-book-review
- ...
- 8 posts total
- 8 posts total