DAC for Aurender N200


For past 2 years I have been running Aurender N200 into Musical Fidelity M6s DAC. The DAC is built like a tank and very versatile, but I must connect via coax since Aurender clock is superior to DAC clock.
Well, I am ready to upgrade DAC for SQ reasons and presently inclining to PSAudio MkII for US mfr, good reviews, good service, current bargain price.
Q1: What DAC (<$8k) would you consider an optimal match for the N200?
Q2: N200 has very few outputs compared with other streamers in its price class.
I know Aurender has always inclined to USB. All else being equal, is USB the best output?

 

hickamore

The Terminator 15th or TPlus and the N200 make a very nice combo as already mentioned a few times.  Not a bad value for us crazy’s either 🤪. I run mine with USB (no DDC to take advantage of I2s), but I’m thinking of jumping ship and going with an Innuos Pulsar.  The Pulsar has just been released with different output modules, one of which is I2s with a built in reclocker.  I’ve compared the Pulsar (with USB) to the N200 and actually like the Pulsar more.  I’ve found it to be even quieter with better staging and imaging and by the time you eliminate the need for a DDC and additional cables, cost wise they’re very close.  With the I2s module it should hopefully be better yet.

Many have already touted the synergy between the N200 and the T+A DAC 200 on this thread. I’ve spoken about the pair many times on this forum. In my opinion, they are simply wonderful together.

Also, not only do they sound great, but given similar form factors, they also look great together.

@blisshifi Is USB connection superior to coax in this pairing? And would you advise a DDC between?

@hickamore It will depend on the cables you are using and your personal sonic preferences. As you likely know, SPDIF leverages the Aurender's internal clock and then gets reclocked by the DAC 200's internal clock, while the USB chain only uses the DAC 200 clock.

In my experience, I've found Coax to be more organic and harmonic sounding unless using a very high quality USB cable. Personally, being spoiled with great audio, I've only LOVED the Final Touch Sinope and Synergistic Research SRX USB cables in terms of USB, and I've otherwise largely been a fan of SPDIF. If you want maximum detail and a crisper, snappier sound, USB may be more your cup of tea, but it often comes at a slight expense of jitter and loss of midrange magic. If you are maxing out the chain with quality power conditioning and cabling, then Coax can deliver excellent dynamics and detail as well.

Of course, SPDIF is also limited in the rate of DSD that can be used (DSD64, and at times DSD128), whereas USB can deliver up to DSD 1024. USB can also deliver PCM up to 768, whereas Coax typically maxes out at 192. That said, the human ear is unable to perceive anything greater than 192, with most not even being able to discern differences greater than 96KHz.

if coax sounds better than USB it means, in most cases, the DAC clock isn’t as good as the clock in the transport/streamer.

@hickamore I have compared the N200 via stock USB vs. via SPDIF using DH Labs digital cable. Yes the coax sounds a bit softer and it may appear to sound slightly more natural at first but the soundstage collapses in comparison and the dynamics are subdued. I haven’t used anything fancier than the DH Labs coax because I saw no point in it - USB sounds more resolving, more dynamic and destroys the coax in soundstage. I use Bricasti M3 DAC and it has a really nice DDS clock that the engineers at Bricasti optimized for their DACs.
I’ve upgraded to AQ Diamond initially and just moved from AQ to Stealth USB after comparing several USB cables. YMMV but you should experiment and determine for yourself in your system what works best for you