poetry makes me mad. It is language that I find interesting, and language is there to convey meaning. Otherwise, why bother?
The problem is this : "meaning" is conveyed in language not on an uni-lateral way but in a multi-polar way ...Meaning exist not on one level but is articulated on many levels, from phonology to pragmatic levels...
Grounded in biology and in the body gestures rythms and vocal gestures rythms and tones are the poetical level of meaning...
Then there is a syntaxical level in speech which has nothing to do with the concept of syntax in the formal language, because human speech syntax is not a "formal" machine even if it can be analysed formally as Chomsky did. ( Gustave Guillaume goes deeper here)
At the top there is analogy which is irreducible to logic no more than metaphor... ( A.I. use statistical engines to decodes it not logic)
The scientific prosaic meaning is a mere half part of language meaning...The most efficient part but not the only and more important meaningfulness...( try to imagine a world of robot communication to understand my point , human social fabric is not a hive )
What is poetry ? Not non sense as superficial look can put it, but deep meaning : " a felt change of consciousness" caused by the way we use words said Owen Barfield in "poetic diction"..
Litterature is as powerful as equations.
Why did Grothendieck used the metaphor"dessins d’enfants" to describe the mathematical concept of some schemes ? Because it speak more directly about the meaning intended and it convey the way the mathematician mind felt the change from the top of the geometrical iceberg draught by a child to his inside hidden depth.
https://www.ams.org/notices/200307/what-is.pdf
The meaning of poetry even when i dont understand the Farsi language in a song for example is there anyway between sounds...I "understand" it...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eS065XPSCFc
My point was that poetry in popular music is as much important as music and part of it...
If the language degenerate in a culture the rest degenerate, even if we had A.I. and especially if we had A.I.
When we speak badly or partially staying on one level instead of using language multidimensionality we think badly...
There is a difference between a bad journaslist and a great poet or a great thinker, but a common point : linear annoying day to day prose.
«We never fall in love "in" prose»--Groucho Marx