Stereophile review of the new Wilson Watt/Puppy


I received my copy of the latest Stereophile yesterday and was curious to see what Martin Collums had to say about them, even though I would take it with a grain of salt, knowing that he had owned them in the past. He's still one of the reviewers that I consider to be most technically informed and balanced in his reviews.

I'm starting this thread because I want to know if others found his conclusions as confusing as I did. He says that the speakers have deep powerful bass, great detail, wonderful dynamic range, and are able to play very loud without breakup. 

However, after all of that, he concludes that they are better for jazz and orchestral and perhaps a bit reticent for pop and rock. This made no sense to me, especially for a $40.000 speaker. I am curious about the opinions of anyone else who has read the review. 

128x128roxy54

I haven't read the review, nor have I heard the latest Watt/Puppy's but in true Audiogon fashion, it won't stop me from responding!  :)

Maybe he's really trying to say is to stick to the high quality recordings, which are typically Jazz and Orchestral, and not rock/pop so much.  

Ultra revealing speakers like Wilson can be a bit over the top with "hot" recordings.  

Maybe I'm completely full of it too - the choice is yours to decide!! Ha

I look forward to hearing these speakers however!

I heard these speakers about a month ago with angostino integrated and dcs streamer along with upper end audio quest cables, told it was about $150k set up, did nothing for me, system sounded nice but the speakers where OK, did vocals/jazz ok but it was just lacking realism