For the life of me I haven't figured out the urge to move so far away from where you were/are on speakers. It's like saying you're tired of a sedan and want to try a truck, in my mind; such a huge difference in sound. Not that one is better or worse.
I started in 1995 with Martin Logan SL3s and still have them but after sixteen years I finally realized there was more to be offered as a 'whole package' by other types of speakers. I looked for a long time before moving to used/demo Dynaudio Sapphires in 2011 which I really loved for five years.
Along the way I heard the original Joseph Audio Pearls and had I $30,000 to spare I'd have owned a pair immediately. I consider the Pulsars a stunning achievement in a stand mounted speaker and the Perspectives superb as well. Then I heard Raidho and realized they were in a whole new league. I bought a small pair of Scansonic MB2.5s for our mountain home but then after listening to the original D1s that Jeff Rowland let me borrow for a few months I knew I had to change.
Thanks to Tyler at Next Level in the the Chicago burbs for allowing me to buy a pair off used Raidho D2s (and to take my mint Sapphires, Scansonics, and Dynaudio Excite X12s in trade). The D2s did every single thing better that the wonderful Sapphires (excepting sheer volume levels) and are my keepers. Buying a pair of Odyssey Audio Kismet monoblocks a few years ago really made them sing even more wonderfully. I still have my SL3s and they can't even try to be close.
Although MLs and other electrostatics can be wonderful sounding it seems like the change is just for the sake of change. Good luck and I hope the money isn't spent with regrets later. My 'boxed' Raidhos give me better detail, air, and body than my MLs ever could. But if one has money to burn...have at it and have fun.