I curently have 3003 MKII with silver plated wires and I am aware of new generation of graphene. The original question is for conclusion if in next step I should go for double run on NES-3005G or coross connected NES-3003G.
Soeaker cables technologic dilema…
We have two technological solutions when it comes to speaker cable:
1. Four wires (2 on + and 2 on -), twisted in a star quad, in a screened braid and in one collective insulation.
2. Second solution: two SEPARATE double-wire cables, one for + and one for -, but without shield.
The number of cores, core cross-section, material, weave, both in NES-3003-G and NES-3005-G everything is the same.
2. Second solution: two SEPARATE double-wire cables, one for + and one for -, but without shield.
The number of cores, core cross-section, material, weave, both in NES-3003-G and NES-3005-G everything is the same.
In the first solution we have a screen, and in the second solution we have a separation of plus and minus.
How will it be better? What to expect?
- ...
- 39 posts total
@milimetr - Not clear if you are talking about a double run of the 3005 in a bi-wire configuration where one pair goes to the MF/HF posts and one pair to the LF posts, or two separate runs with both wires inside of one jacket going to one polarity (i.e., + or -). The only reason I would do a double run as described above would be to bring a larger wire gauge to the LF posts in a bi-wire configuration since connecting both wires in one jacket to a single pole would result in losing all the noise cancelling benefits of having twisted wires. @asvjerry - As discussed on the Supra Cable site, the screen shield in a speaker cable would most effectively be grounded to the amplifier chassis, or maybe to a univeral ground box. The negative pole at the amplifier would be a last choice. From Supra Cables:
|
- 39 posts total