What makes a Cd player a Great cd player


Can someone please explain to me what a great cdp do that a good cdp wont do? Is the purpose to make what has actually been recorded sound better, or to merly expose what has been recorded?
ddan6815
Wow, didn't realize the DCS DAC architecture could be had for that price! I'd jump on that deal if the Arcam sounds anything like the DCS gear I have heard!
Mapman - I could be wrong about reason (production yield) - look here: http://forum.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/fr.pl?ddgtl&1186749514

The main problem with DACs is how to get better than 16 bit linearity. Most you can get in traditional architecture is around 18 bit. Sigma_Delta DACs can deliver much better linearity but it is only in specifications. Fast Sigma-Delta has timing issues (inaccuracies)that effectively translate to noise and limit resolution perhaps to the same 18 bits. Ring-Dac allows to get a little more by rotating components to get accurate dithered average current on the output of the DAC. Original CD data is only 16-bit but digital filtering increases resolution.
Yes, the ring dac architecture for applying dither from what I have read strikes me as a very practical way to achieve higher resolution yet retain a smooth response and full dynamic range. When I've heard the DCS gear, what my ears heard was consistent with what I would expect having investigated the technology in more detail a bit later after the fact.

That DCS sourced system produced some of the most natural sounding massed orchestral strings I have ever heard from a CD source. I attribute at least part of that to the unique Ring DAC design.