I loved my Panny SA XR 50 in my bedroom system until it died.
Has anyone switched from Class AB/A to Class D? Was it better? Was it worse?
I heard a class D amp the other day (Lyngdorf) and it sounded really good. I liked the minimalism of it also. But, I need to own a amp for a couple of months to really know if I like it or not. I don't like room correction ether, so I just liked the sound without that.
Curious, has anyone ever switched from a class AB or class A amp to a class D amp? If so, did you regret it? Was it a downgrade in sound? Or was it upgrade in sound?
- ...
- 70 posts total
@tomcarr ya, I was eyeing the Class D PS audio monoblocks. But it really stinks for me to buy them without hearing them. Even with the 30 day return period. Were able to hear them first before buying them? |
There are a few differences: 1. I don't think we really know how long class D amps will last, how they will most likely fail, or whether they can be maintained in the same sense as a conventional amp. They could last longer. 2. Class D amps use far more complex designs. Many of the amplifier boards are built as modules and used by multiple amp makers. That's why a class D amp will often be identified as a Nilai, NCORE, Purifi, PASCAL, etc. Some (all?) of these companies also build and sell compatible power supply boards. Add a case, power switch, input buffer. wires & connectors, and you're done! I don't think all class D amps are built this way, though. 3. The more recent introduction of GAN FETs has made for another family of class D amps. I don't know if these are also mostly being based on modular sub-assemblies; what makes them distinct is the use of a specific kind of transistor. None of these are necessarily negatives, just things that occurred to me recently. Hopefully, @atmasphere will drop by and fill in the blanks (please?) |
- 70 posts total