I have separates, but would have no problem with either of these superb integrated amps. The Nagra is lighter and more compact so it might be better for downsizing
Nagra Classic Integrated amp
Jadis DA 88 S
Integrated that blew you away
Like most I run separates but am looking to downsize but also upgrade. So for the first time since I decided I wanted as close to a world class system as I could afford, I’m looking at integrated amps.
So if you’re a separates guy/gal but heard an integrated that really struck you. Please share. I want to hear all the steamy details. The speakers, the source, the pursed lips and steamy glances.
- ...
- 138 posts total
I am going to agree with @larryi. I have had the A40 in my system and wish I didn’t sell it, I would now like to use it in a secondary system. Has a great built in DAC as well. If you want a bit more power the A100 is a nice upgrade. The only reason it is no longer mine is I upgraded to separates. john |
| Post removed |
My main system: C-J: ART 88, ART Phono, 27A My summer home system: Marantz PM10 and matching SA10 I did compare them together before sending the Marantz stuff to it's new home. The Marantz PM10 has a Class D amp, separate power supplies for each channel and also another separate one for the preamp section. The C-J 27 A is Class A. The C-J has better micro detail, but the difference is subtle. Both offer superior liquidity, sound stage depth, and allow hours of listening without fatigue. The Marantz has much more power and handles difficult impedance loads with ease. It is a great match for B&W 802D diamonds, which is why it was my choice. There is clear superiority for both the C-J 88 Line Stage and Phonostage. Greater resolution of detail, more life like imaging, just more magic. |
- 138 posts total