Phono Stage - The great analog tragedy


In the world of analog playback, there is an interesting observation. There has been tremendous innovation in the field of 
Turntable - Direct, Idler, Belt
Cartridge - MM, MC, MI
Tonearm - Gimbal, Unipivot, Linear Tracking

For all of the above designs we find some of the best reference components designed in the 50s, 60s, 70s and 80s. Most of the modern products are inspired from these extraordinary products of the past. But when it comes to phono stage, there is hardly any "reference component" from that era. They just standardized RIAA curve for sanity and left it. Manufacturers made large preamps and amps and allocated a puny 5% space for a small phono circuit even in their reference models, like a necessary evil. They didn’t bother about making it better. 

The result? It came down to the modern designers post 2000 after vinyl resurgence to come up with serious phono stages for high end systems. Unfortunately they don’t have any past reference grade designs to copy or get inspired from. Effectively, just like DACs, reference phono stages is also an evolving concept, and we don’t have too many choices when we want a really good one which is high-res and natural sounding. Very few in the world have figured out a proper high end design so far. And most of the decent ones have been designed in the past couple of decades. The best of the breed are probably yet to come.  

It is a tragedy that our legendary audio engineers from the golden era didn’t focus on the most sensitive and impactful component, "the phono stage"

pani

They can exist in the same chassis, but the advantage of these being separate should be obvious. 

To be clear, there were separate high end phono stages in the 70's & 80's - just not in the magazines. There are audio companies outside of the US.

Examples would be Analog Devices AD-E1 ( Japan, price 1.7million yen in the late 80's ), Burmester ( Germany, 838 phono in 83 ( cheapie ) ), Final Audio/Takai Labs ( Japan, 70's, bespoke phono stages with up to 4 phono inputs ), Mactone ( Japan, 60's ).  There were plenty of others.

 

They can exist in the same chassis, but the advantage of these being separate should be obvious. 

No it's not obvious. One could argue the opposite. Don't believe the all the marketing bs and hype.

 

In the 70's I believe I bought my first Album ever which was one produced by the Monkees. The Group had probably disbanded when I bough my Album, but TV made them attractive to a young person.

In the 80's Vinyl LP Album collecting became much more intense, weekly purchases will have been common. 

In the Late 80's / Early 90's I recollect Stand Alone Phonostages becoming regualar tipics of conversation during the 90's I had a SS Phonostage commission built for me. This is still owned today and has been out on a Long Term Loan for more than 2 Years.

Nearly 30 Years Later I am having another SS Phonostage Commission Built for me with a different approach to the Spec's.

I am assured the Spec's being produced are very very high spec, whatever that means, I look only to  Power On and listen and not get too bogged down in the measurements.

My Wife worries about Valves used for Amp's, I am making available to her in her own requested pace for a System Set Up. My SP 10 MK II and the new SS Phon', will be loaned as a MM set Up with a Neurochrome Amp' and New High Efficiency Speakers. The above apart from the New SS Phon' will be gifted to her for her own Vinyl Replays when the home is refurbished and moved back into. 

I will get the 90's SS Phon' back as well to see how things have changed.   

What Dover said.  I can give you some "obvious" advantages of a full function preamplifier vs separate line and phono stages. Provided you allow for the luxury of an outboard PS for the full function preamp, I would argue that is the inherently superior configuration, all other things being equal of course.