Is bi amping worth it ?


New thinking ? 
 

the subwoofer world is quite confusing . so I have  left that decision alone for a bit.  I have recently read where bi amping the khorns could give me the little more bass punch I am looking for. ?    The 601 mono-blocks certainly have enough power but I have a tube pre amp C-2300 that does not separate bass and treble signals so would need to add an external crossover.  
 

anyone have any experience with this ? Is this worth the effort ?  And if so any recommendations on the external crossover ? 
 

thanks again everyone. I greatly appreciate all input from this forum.  

hardhattg

I have the Linkwitz Orions - which have 4 channels in each speaker separately amped - with an active analog crossover to taylor the sound of each channel.  It does make a difference.  Few speakers sound as good as the Orions or the LX521s truly phenomenal sound.  But - Linkwitz engineered the channel crossovers and signal processing for each channel - I would never have had the skill and patience to engineer it all.  

The Legacy Audio speakers also provide separate amplification for the various channels with a phenomenal crossover / signal processor (Wavelet) - which produces phenomenal sound like the Linkwitz speakers do.

So - yes - it does make a big difference - but you must have the skill and patience to achieve great sound.  Much easier to buy the complete system / set up already engineered to produce the phenomenal sound of these systems.  I’m sure I would not have the skill and patience to do it - and I doubt many do.

@namrider1 "2. If you’re streaming music, get a streamer that has EQ.  I use Eversolo w/o using their DACS - just straight stream, but their EQ in their app is easy and excellent."

Sorry but no.  I love my Eversolo DMP-A6 as a streamer, but their builtin EQ sounds horrible compared to my analog Parasound 2100 preamp with tone controls.

I currently 2-way bi-amp my PS AUDIO FR5  with PARASOUND 2100 preamp’s active 80Hz highpass to the tweeter, 2 subwoofers with builtin active crossover at 40Hz lowpass

NEXT adventure: A 3-way active custom crossover controls everything: 1750Hz matches the PS AUDIO FR5 (bi-amped high and mid), lowpass 40Hz to the 2 subwoofers

----

source=Apple Music lossless

My video:

https://youtu.be/IwdzDbRUs_0

OK folks. Listen up. Here's WHY active crossovers are so very much better than passive. A single loudspeaker driver is an inductor, and provides a frequency dependent, reactive load to an amplifier. Looking at the image here, the blue line on the bottom is the frequency dependent impedance curve for an SB Acoustics SB29RDAC Ring Dome Tweeter, and it typical of any dynamic tweeter. As you can see, it is anything but flat, yet it is listed as having a 4 ohm impedance. It's 4 ohms at about 1200 hz, but at 600 hz, has an impedance of nearly 10 ohms.

Now if you put a passive crossover circuit in front of it, you add capacitors, resistors and inductors, which then give you a frequency dependent impedance curve which looks like a Coney Island roller coaster. And that's just for a tweeter high-pass circuit.

Now when you add in mid and bass drivers, with high and low pass filters there... It's a real mess. But we're not done there yet. Nope. Many of your extreme hi-end loudspeakers add in equalization to their crossover designs, which makes that impedance curve even worse. This is very hard for an amp to properly manage. That's why people drop many, many thousands of dollars on things like Krell, Threshhold, Bryston, or Rowland Research solid state power amps.

Now when you use an active crossover, an amp channel only has to manage a single driver. There's no passive, reactive component in between the amp and the loudspeaker driver. Then you don't need a megabuck amp to deal with it.

All of the Linkwitz loudspeaker designs use active crossovers. Earlier designs used analog crossovers, but his last designs were all digital crossovers. There are some digital crossovers that offer DSP EQ, which allows you to tailor the total system response for the room you are in. Then you're not just limited to whatever sound your speakers give you in the room you're stuck with.

The lowest cost active crossovers are typically pro grade, from manufacturers like Behringer, dbx, Rane or even Nady. There are many manufacturers. Some of the best known home audio digital crossovers are from miniDSP.

Another major benefit is that you can use much, much lower powered amps when you use active crossovers. A lot of power is wasted having to push through a passive crossover. You really don't need to push many watts into a tweeter or mid-range driver to get a lot of level out. You could even run a single ended tube amp on your tweeter, and a mid-level tube power amp on your mid-range driver, and a solid state amp for the bass driver. You have a lot of options.

So instead of dropping the Big Bux on some gigantic extreme power amp, you could spend much less on an active crossover and the various much more modestly priced amps of your choice.
 

 

 

This is a very interesting thread and good points have been made.  Everyone should try to understand what @russbutton posted.  Bi-amping is complicated.  I owned a pair of bi-amped Bozak Concert Grands for several years and can attest that everything he said is true for those and most traditional or older designs.  It is nevertheless true, however, that there are modern designs where sophisticated passive crossovers have been built that take all of the variables into account.  With these very sophisticated designs there would be no benefit to bi-amping.  So while it can be agreed that generally bi-amping can improve the sound of speakers, that is not always true and we should be particularly cautious of messing with newer, more sophisticated designs where that might not be so.