Esoteric K-01 vs dCS Puccini


Has anyone A/B'd them ?
dr_john
I traded in my X01D2 for the K01. Ther is no comparison, the K01 is far superior in every way, it is obvious and no A-B comparison is required to distinguish the difference.And, that is saying a lot, because the X-01D2 is an excellent CD/SACD player.
Matjet... Have you auditioned the MPS-5? Love to hear what you think if you have now that you own the K-01.

I love to A-B the Esoteric K-01 with the Playback Designs MPS-5 at some point.
Matjet.

Thanks. I initially wanted to buy the K-01 when it 1st came out but couldn't so bought the MPS-5 instead. I'm sure the K-01 is also a stonking player.
I had the MPS5 for a year side by side with the P03D03Rubidum clock and I'd say that the Esoteric stack, when upsampling redbook CD to DSD were similar. I later sold the Esoteric transport and DAC to save money and space and then bought the dCS Paganini stack and ran it with the Esoteric clock. I found the Paganini to have better deep bass definition and slam with incredible detail and energy; that being said I still sold it as I found the sound to be a bit overwhelming. I did later sell the MPS 5 (I understand there were factory updates to the unit but mine only had firmware not power supply etc.). The one constant through all this has been my Boulder DAC, which is the unit I've preferred for redbook all the while. I am still looking for a be all end all SACD player, preferably one chassis.

My transport (Esoteric UX1) serves as my SACD solution and I'm not sure it's worth my SACD collection to spring for a Emm XDS1 or K-01. However, I've thought about it...and have done the system appraisal to see what I have that I am willing to part with.

I did hear the K01 at an audio show in Asia but I was in the Esoteric room to buy the SACDs and the gear was completely unfamiliar to me. The rep did say the P03D03 was still likely a step up from the K01. That being said, if the K01, using AKM DACs, has a sonic signature similar to the sweet sounding D05, I may consider it.