S/Pdif vs. Toslink


I picked up a Musical Fidelity V-Link to use between my Macbook and my Cambridge 840 CDP. The V-Link can send data to the CDP via either S/Pdif or Toslink. I went with the Tosslink but more on a whim that with any actual reason.

Does anyone have a preference for Toslink over S/Pdif, or vice versa? Just curious what people are using and why.

Regards
grimace
i've never been able to hear a huge sonic difference between the two, so i always prefer coax because it's a tighter physical connection--optical cables occiasionally dislodge.
btw, why did you get the v-link nasmuch as your cdp has a very good external dac?
chhers, lj
I like the electrical isolation provided by optical cables. If I ever get the dreaded mysterious hum, I will not have to suspect my computer...
I use both with the same Pioneer transport and my Wyred 4 Sound DAC2 and can change to either cable at the push of a button. I think the Toslink sounds a bit more organic/rich in the midrange, so I usually like it for female vocals and other music with good recordings of brass and other midrange instruments.

The coax, on the other hand sounds a little faster/crisper and perhaps more dynamic on other recordings that exploit these virtues. Neither cable sounds best on all music...
@ Loomis - I needed the V-Link because the CDP only has Tos or P/Dif digital inputs - no direct interface for the USB output from my computer.

I'm told you can use the audio output on the laptop, but then you're using the laptop as a DAC and the quality suffers.
I was using Toslink between my Mac Mini and Altmann DAC for a couple of years, but when I switched to spdif using a John Kenny modified HiFace along with a Black Cat cable I heard what I was missing. The Toslink certainly smooths things out, but at the expense of detail.

The great thing about computer audio is that substantial upgrades can be had for relatively inexpensive cost. A lot is system-dependent, so the usual YMMV disclaimer.