Have digital players improved

Mr. T , better IS subjective, but wow, " components from the 60's through the 80's when configured sound better than todays better stereo system's ". I don't know what equipment you've used to draw that conclusion. I've been changing and upgrading since 1972 and with each newer component the sound quality Improves, in my opinion. This outlook gets driven home when I reinstall one of my older highly rated components into my system just to reminisce old times. This is fun and entertaining for audiophile/music loving friends that are over for a visit, but after a short while we are ready to go back to my newer, more accurate gear. To each his own.
Regards Tim

Tmsorosk, your thread above and comments made saying;

"Both formats have there virtues and anyone that feels one is superior to the other in every way has not been exposed to enough of both."

Now that's misleading to others reading and a joke! I do agree they are different but the rest you wrote clearly demonstrates you are the one not exposed to enough or just can't hear the difference or just prefer disc which is okay.

and when you wrote;

"If their that narrow minded why are they trolling the digital site's."

This statement is just stupid and clearly demonstrats your true colors.

Kindly enlighten us by providing a list of what you feel are your top 3 prefered red-book players and a list of your prefered 3 tables with arm/cart combo's you have owned or had in your own system comparing these two formats to come to the conclusion you speak of.

This should be entertaining.

Tmsorosk, I found the following thread posted by you so others can read, speaks volumns for it's self showing your true colors.

06-10-11: Tmsorosk

Since vinylphiles continually cruise the digital site with there one sided opinions telling all that analog is so much better , I thought I would come over here and tell everyone how inferior analog is . I trashed my vinyl years ago and have been happy ever since .
Digital rules .
Tmsorosk

I never never go back to see what members have posted in the past on another forum. That seems not right to me. The discussion at hand is the one right in front of you. Statements stand on their own merit. This is not a gotcha thingy.

Rok2id, are you for real? That's your problem then isn't, I call a spade when I see it.

The OP firstly starts this new thread that is so boring and old, all one needs to do is do a search as there are endless ones but then goes onto make some bold statements saying;

"I'm not claiming one format is better than the other"

and says;

"If their that narrow minded why are they trolling the digital site's. I like both, what's their hangup."

this same person just few months ago whom makes it a point to onto a anolog forum on this site and posts;

06-10-11: Tmsorosk

Since vinylphiles continually cruise the digital site with there one sided opinions telling all that analog is so much better , I thought I would come over here and tell everyone how inferior analog is . I trashed my vinyl years ago and have been happy ever since .
Digital rules .
Tmsorosk

what do you call that ..... and then you post and this all coming from someone who posted

12-30-11: Rok2id

Surely this is not 'breaking news' I got out of vinyl as soon as the first CD players appeared. What took you so long?

Rok2id

Please, you guys must be twins.

Like I said above enjoy what ever it may be but when I see such postings and others will be reading I feel it's important for such to adressed, if you don't like it too bad move on and don't post.