CD quality versus SA-CD ?is it worth it?

I have found it goes from disc to disc and how well its done. There are some good SACD and some that just not worth the extra money. It helps to have a good SACD/CD player. But you do not have to break the bank to get into one. I had a OPPO 105 using the XLR outs that sounded good on SACD and CDs. Moved up to the ESOTERIC KO3x and really enjoyed some SACDs.
Enjoy Pete

If you can come up with another $200, there is an Esoteric DV-50s, a really good older CD/SACD/DVD player, on Audiogon right now for $1200.

SACD supposed to be better by carrying 4x more info in addition to better transition response related to "weaker" low pass filters. It won't help a bit if it is converted from 16/44.1. IMHO it isn't worth the money. I would rather optimize 16/44.1 system. Some CDs I have sound magnificent showing ability of the media.

My humble opinion...
1)SA-CD is worth it because better care is given through out the entire recording/mastering/transfering process than it is with CDs. In other words, you will find a higher % of bad sounding recordings (i.e. "re-mastered", or mastered for radio/car audio, not hi-fi) on CDs than you will on SA-CDs.
2) Everything is recorded in hi-rez these days, so it makes sense to not compromise the master quality by transfering it in 16/44.1. So we are kind of forced into hi-rez playback.
3) I asked myself the same question a few years ago. My playback system consisted of Yamaha dvd player feeding spdif to a MSB Link III DAC. I was wondering if a new generation yamaha blu-ray/sacd player would sound better than the MSB. The answer is YES with CDs, and obviously yes with hi-rez material, either on thumb drives or on hard disc... blu-ray, 24/96 and dff files.
I got the BD-s677 for $250 to try, and it is MUCH better in everyway, more natural/fluid than the MSB. A definite keeper at the price point.