Strange Tonearm Tweak. Long


As you all know, I am a little different. I like to read and study stuff like tonearm technology. I noticed that some of the better unipivot designs have employed "outrigger" style outboard weighting systems on their arms, that work like a tightrope-walker's balance pole. This not only balances azimuth, but also gives the arm better stability to lateral deflections from the cartridge suspension, so the arm is not moved when the stylus is pushed laterally by the groove information. I began to think on this, and I wondered why no gimbal-bearing arm makers are doing this. Surely since the vertical plane rides on a vertical axis bearing, there is still some chance for the arm to be laterally deflected by the stylus, when the stylus should be doing all of the moving, not the arm. I think that this is why they use heavy arms, but a heavy arm in the vertical movement plane is not good for tracking. A heavy arm in the horizontal movement plane is good for resisting sideways deflection that would impair pickup function.

So I decided to try increasing the mass of my tonearm in the lateral plane, while keeping it light in the vertical plane, by the use of "outrigger" weights, just like a unipivot does.

I bought lead fishing weights that looked like long rifle bullets(just the lead part) They were about an inch long and about 3/8" diameter, and weighed 12 grams each. I drilled into the bases about 1/4" and press-fitted them onto the nuts that hold the arm into the bearing yoke, so they stuck out straight sideways, like sideways spikes. This put the weight out pretty far to the sides as outriggers, and kept the weight centered exactly around the bearing pivot axis so it did not increase the vertical mass significantly, but it did very slightly. It did not influence the tracking force at all.

So now the arm had outrigger stabilizers on it in the horizontal plane of motion.

I put on a record and sat down to listen. Let me tell you, fellas, this was a mind blower. I have never heard this much information come out of a cartridge before. I heard sounds on records that I had listened to for 30 years, and never knew those sounds were on the record! And I have had some pretty good analog gear in my time. And what I didn't own, I heard at the audio store I worked at. This is the most astounding mod I have ever heard on a tonearm. And it cost me $1.49 for the fishing weights, and I got 3 extras.

The only slightly negative thing about it, is that it increases the anti-skating force, so you have to cut that back a little, and if you have some marginal scratches that might skip, they are more likely to skip with this mod, due to the resistance to sideways movement provided by the outriggers. I had this happen once last night, but I didn't consider it a problem.

But the increase in dynamics, and detail and overall sound quality is astronomical. It blew me away.

I have a DL103, which is a very stiff cartridge, and it may be that this is not needed for a higher compliance cart. But, I think that it would be good for anything that is medium or lower in compliance.

The key to it, is that it only increases the resistance to sideways movement, without interfering with the effective mass of the arm, or the vertical swing movement that needs to stay light to track warps. I played some warped records with this mod, and they played just as well as without the mod, except they sounded better.

I have a pretty good analog setup now, but I can say without reservation, that this mod made my rig sound better than any analog rig that I have ever heard in my life. I have never heard a Rockport.

Stabilizing the arm against unwanted lateral deflection increases the information retrieval and dynamics by a very large percentage. If your arm is not set up like a Rega style arm, then you can glue a 1 ounce long rod across the top of the bearing housing(sideways) like a tightrope-walker's balance pole. Use lead if you can, it won't ring. You don't have to do any permanent changes to your arm that might wreck its resale value to try this out. If it has anywhere near the effect on your system as it had on mine, you won't be taking it off.

It may come close to the movement of your cueing lever, so make sure you have clearance to use it. Mine was close, and I have to come in from the side now to use the lever, at the end of a record. That is fine with me! This was a major, major improvement in the sound of my rig. It is staying permanently. As in "forever".

If you are a little tweak-oriented, and not afraid to do stuff like this. You should try it. It will knock you over.
twl
Glad you guys are enjoying the mod. I emailed Basement and suggested a VTA change to restore the tonal balance. With the added authority of the bass info provided with the HiFi mod, it is concievable that a VTA change could be in order. I speculate that a slight rise in VTA will give him the mids and highs that he wants, and more detail will be shown there too. With his VTA previously adjusted for the tonal balance of the unmodded arm, this mod just may require that VTA adjustment. I needed to adjust mine also.

Nate, if you didn't notice as much bass improvement as you may have liked, you might try lowering your VTA a slight amount, and see how you like that.

I am very happy that this has been an improvement for both of you, as well as for myself. I think that this is absolutely a Kick-Ass mod.

I am looking into the packaging and marketing aspects of this right now.
Interestingly enough, I did have the vta adjusted like this for the second part of my listening. Before this, I was careful to match the vta to where the vta was on the immedia, which is usually about 1 millameter higher at the beginning of the record with the cartridge just before the lead out groove. While in readings it seems that that is unusually high, both me and my dealer found the same vta for the clavis seperately before we consulted each other. I found this true with the lydian as well. Every other cartridge I have used has been with the vta lower in the back.
That experience alone has made me pay attention to vta. While tonal balance can be affected, I don't adjust vta for it. I don't think that you have either, but right off I would think that the mod is allowing for a set up that is more orietated to extracting more detail, rather than subtracting it in the mod itself. As I have listened to it a little more, I have no indication that there is anything odd or incorrect in the tonal balance. Subjectively I would say it is more correct.
A freind of mine stopped by while I was playing a record, and he commented on how good the system is sounding. He hears my stereo often but he is a non-audiophile.
I am still in the direction that there is improvement to be had in the rb that is more revealed by this mod, rather than that it is just a trade off for the improvement in other areas. I have always thought that the rb sounded a little weird, somehow, in it's energy, and the reviews that I have read, all think it is a great arm but every reviewer, evan those of a glowing review, have something they hear that keeps them from putting it at the top of the best they ever heard, or what they believe is the best, etc.
And also, bear in mind the reputation for the tonal qualities of the immedia.
This is one of the most fun and promising mods I have done in a long time, my own or purchased, or tried from another's idea, maybe the best. I hope you get the credit you deserve, because you (twl) have brought me much enjoyment in the sound evan if I was to leave it at this.
But don't think I will.
Best of luck, Twl, with whatever venture you may undertake to market your idea - have you sought patent advice? I'm just sorry that I can't try it out for myself, as I would love to be able to test this on my own ears. Well, I returned Saturday from a brief out-of-town excursion, and as usual, I came home laden with scrounged vinyl, so at least I have something to console myself with!
It is truly a shame that this tweaek did not take off. The cost is virtually nothing and the benefits are huge. There is nothing a person could do to their turntable or arm that will is this cheap and sounds this much better. A person could spend hundreds of dollars on a better arm that would not be as much of an improvement.
TWL should be in line for the tweak of the year award. This is a product that should have been incorporated in better arms for years. Why it has not been done before is anyone's guess, but it should be done now.
The improvement is not subtle, it makes a dramatic differerence.
Anyone who has a pivoting tonearm needs to have this. Even if a person is not handy! This is easy to do, and worth the minimal cost.
WOW! WOW!! WOW!!! WOW!!!! WOW!!!!! WOW!!!!!! WOW!!!!!!!
God Bless Tom W. Lyons "esquire"
Thank you so much Tom, It’s as if some one has remastered my Record collection.