Strange Tonearm Tweak. Long


As you all know, I am a little different. I like to read and study stuff like tonearm technology. I noticed that some of the better unipivot designs have employed "outrigger" style outboard weighting systems on their arms, that work like a tightrope-walker's balance pole. This not only balances azimuth, but also gives the arm better stability to lateral deflections from the cartridge suspension, so the arm is not moved when the stylus is pushed laterally by the groove information. I began to think on this, and I wondered why no gimbal-bearing arm makers are doing this. Surely since the vertical plane rides on a vertical axis bearing, there is still some chance for the arm to be laterally deflected by the stylus, when the stylus should be doing all of the moving, not the arm. I think that this is why they use heavy arms, but a heavy arm in the vertical movement plane is not good for tracking. A heavy arm in the horizontal movement plane is good for resisting sideways deflection that would impair pickup function.

So I decided to try increasing the mass of my tonearm in the lateral plane, while keeping it light in the vertical plane, by the use of "outrigger" weights, just like a unipivot does.

I bought lead fishing weights that looked like long rifle bullets(just the lead part) They were about an inch long and about 3/8" diameter, and weighed 12 grams each. I drilled into the bases about 1/4" and press-fitted them onto the nuts that hold the arm into the bearing yoke, so they stuck out straight sideways, like sideways spikes. This put the weight out pretty far to the sides as outriggers, and kept the weight centered exactly around the bearing pivot axis so it did not increase the vertical mass significantly, but it did very slightly. It did not influence the tracking force at all.

So now the arm had outrigger stabilizers on it in the horizontal plane of motion.

I put on a record and sat down to listen. Let me tell you, fellas, this was a mind blower. I have never heard this much information come out of a cartridge before. I heard sounds on records that I had listened to for 30 years, and never knew those sounds were on the record! And I have had some pretty good analog gear in my time. And what I didn't own, I heard at the audio store I worked at. This is the most astounding mod I have ever heard on a tonearm. And it cost me $1.49 for the fishing weights, and I got 3 extras.

The only slightly negative thing about it, is that it increases the anti-skating force, so you have to cut that back a little, and if you have some marginal scratches that might skip, they are more likely to skip with this mod, due to the resistance to sideways movement provided by the outriggers. I had this happen once last night, but I didn't consider it a problem.

But the increase in dynamics, and detail and overall sound quality is astronomical. It blew me away.

I have a DL103, which is a very stiff cartridge, and it may be that this is not needed for a higher compliance cart. But, I think that it would be good for anything that is medium or lower in compliance.

The key to it, is that it only increases the resistance to sideways movement, without interfering with the effective mass of the arm, or the vertical swing movement that needs to stay light to track warps. I played some warped records with this mod, and they played just as well as without the mod, except they sounded better.

I have a pretty good analog setup now, but I can say without reservation, that this mod made my rig sound better than any analog rig that I have ever heard in my life. I have never heard a Rockport.

Stabilizing the arm against unwanted lateral deflection increases the information retrieval and dynamics by a very large percentage. If your arm is not set up like a Rega style arm, then you can glue a 1 ounce long rod across the top of the bearing housing(sideways) like a tightrope-walker's balance pole. Use lead if you can, it won't ring. You don't have to do any permanent changes to your arm that might wreck its resale value to try this out. If it has anywhere near the effect on your system as it had on mine, you won't be taking it off.

It may come close to the movement of your cueing lever, so make sure you have clearance to use it. Mine was close, and I have to come in from the side now to use the lever, at the end of a record. That is fine with me! This was a major, major improvement in the sound of my rig. It is staying permanently. As in "forever".

If you are a little tweak-oriented, and not afraid to do stuff like this. You should try it. It will knock you over.
twl
Thank you, Doug.

As you know, I am very sensitive to dynamics in general, since it is my belief that dynamics is where much of the emotion in the music lies. As music is an emotional expression, it is very important to me, to have this emotion properly conveyed. The power of macro-dynamics, and the subtle nuances of micro-dynamics, and their attendant emotional contexts really bring the intent of the composer and musicians to the forefront, and I need to have that in my musical presentation, as effectively as possible.

This is why I strove to find an improvement in that area for the tonearms. I just wanted to get that information off the record, and into my system.

It is also why I use very high efficiency speakers, which have an extremely low dynamic threshold. These speakers with 100db efficiency move at the slightest electrical impulse, and therefore have extremely good microdynamic performance. It would take a much higher level electrical signal to even get an 80db efficient speaker starting to move. This low-level signal resolution of high efficiency speakers is another key to hearing all the music available on the disc. I effectively reach down 10-20db deeper into the dynamic range of a recording with a system like this. Low level detail really comes out. My speakers are producing details which don't even get a "normal" speaker into motion.

Also, low power SET amps are very delicate in their presentation of the low-level details and can only power high-efficiency speakers like I use. The combination of these items together really makes a very enjoyable listening experience. Of course, I went with an incredible combination of OTL-SET and single driver loudspeakers, which do away with crossover distortion, and effectively drive the speaker cones directly from the output tubes, which doesn't hurt any.

A system is just that: a system. If you know what you want, and know how to get it, you can assemble a very enjoyable package of products which will really rock your boat. It doesn't have to be the most expensive, it just has to be what you like.
Ah, the magic of low level detail and micro-dynamic nuance. Yum. These allow the real humanity in the music to come through.

I "knew" this intellectually but had never really heard it until we got a new cartridge. Comparing the ZYX Airy to the Shelter 901 is perhaps something like comparing your amp/speakers to mine. There's little or no loss of macro-dynamics, but the Airy's ability to play down to very soft levels with subtlety and nuance really breathes life into the musicians. It's at least the equal of a Koetsu RSP in this regard, probably better, but without the syrupy warmth.

From what little I've found to read about them, all the ZYX models seem to share this trait, to varying degrees I suppose. I don't recall if you've heard one but I urge you to try. (That 501 can't last forever!)

Of course I should follow my own advice and consider changing directions with our speakers and amplifier. We're not quite ready to give up "full" frequency response though, particularly since we enjoy stuff like organ music with its low pedal notes. If you'll forgive the obscenities, would either a sub or active X-overs work in a setup like yours?
Joe, I haven't been doing much posting here lately, because frankly I've been a little tired of some of the argumentative posters. It made being here much less fun than it used to be.
Doug, I really like the ZYX Airy. It is a great cartridge all-around. I have been recommending the ZYX cartridges for quite awhile. I'm sure you've seen my posting about them.
Right now my finances don't allow me the luxury of moving in that direction. I'm pretty much stuck where I am until things pick up financially for me.
Mr slate I'll be right over with those papers! Anyway, I still want to do the mod, but now need a good MC to use. I have started a new business with my wife, and plan on rollin' in the dough in a few weeks. Well at least as much as selling cookies to teenagers will allow. I believe I will go with a Denon 103r, just need to decide who to go through. Any suggestions? Then I will be ready to mod out my 250 to the final tilt. I believe I will leave the re-wire last, after reading Mr slate's post.