TriPlanar Tips


The manual that comes with the TriPlanar Mk VII tonearm is fairly complete, but there are a few things I’ve learned only by living with the arm. Note: I do not know which if any of these would apply to previous versions of the arm. My only experience is with the Mk VII.

1. NEVER raise the cueing lever while the arm is locked in the arm rest. This pressures the damping cylinder and could cause a silicone leak. For this reason and also for safety, whenever the arm is in the arm rest the cueing lever should be DOWN. This is backwards from most arms and takes some getting used to.

2. If your Tri-Planar doesn't cue straight down there's a quick fix, which may be included on some new arms. The problem is insufficient friction between the arm tube and the hard rubber cueing support bar. Just glue a bit of thin sandpaper to the underside of the arm tube. Make it big enough and position it so it hits the cueing support bar at all points across the arm’s arc. (Note: after doing this you will need to adjust the cueing height, see Tip #3.)

3. When adjusting cueing height (instructions are in the manual) always do so with the arm in the UP position. This adjustment is VERY touchy, since the cueing support bar is so close to the pivot. Be patient and be careful of your cartridge. (Note: after doing this you may need to adjust the anti-skate initiation point, see Tip #4.)

Chris Brady of Teres told me of a way to improve cueing even more by re-shaping the cueing support. Moving the cueing support point farther from the pivot improves its mechanical advantage and makes the cueing height and speed adjustments less touchy. This mod is easier than it sounds and requires only a length of coat hanger (!), but I don’t have pix and haven’t yet done it myself.

4. Changing the cueing height affects the point where anti-skate kicks in. (Yes, it's weird.) Once cueing height is satisfactory, adjust the short pin that sticks out of the front of the cueing frame. That pin controls where the anti-skate dogleg first engages the knot on the string.

5. The Tri-Planar comes with three counterweight donuts of differing masses. Many cartridges can be balanced using either of two. The arm usually tracks best with the heaviest donut that will work, mounted closer to the pivot. Of course this also reduces effective mass, which may or may not be sonically desirable depending on the cartridge. It also leaves more room for Tip #6.

6. For fine VTF adjustments don’t futz with the counterweight, there’s an easier way. Set the counterweight for the highest VTF you think you’ll need (ie, close to the pivot). Pick up some 1/4" I.D. O-rings from Home Depot. To reduce VTF a bit just slip an O-ring or two on the end stub. Thin O-rings reduce VTF by .01-.02g, thick ones by .04-.05g. Quick, cheap, effective. (For safety, always lock the arm down while adding or removing O-rings.)

7. When adjusting VTA, always bring the pointer to the setting you want by turning it counter-clockwise at least ¼ of a turn. This brings the arm UP to the spot you've selected, which takes up the slop in the threads. You can easily feel this happening.

Hope someone finds these useful. If you know any more, please bring ‘em on!
dougdeacon
Nandric, You were correct to abandon the use of a groove-less disc to set AS. I just do it by ear. It was very obvious that the Urushi was in need of AS after a short listen without it, since I knew well how the Urushi sounded with AS. Without it, there was obvious distortion in the R channel and the L side of the "soundstage" or "image" fell apart. With the Colibri, the issue is still unsettled. However, given Doug's (correct) reasoning, it would not be surprising that it also "needs" a little AS, because I have increased the effective mass and the weight of the cartridge and related parts. I am also using 1.5g VTF (the top of the vdH recommended range). I usually use 2.0g with the Urushi. My quick listen both ways suggests that the Colibri needs some AS compensation.
Dear Lewm,We are coplaining about those AS weights,it seems to me,to the wrong address: to each other.
I caused the misunderstanding by using the exression 'bias-weight'. This was caused to me 'cause I thought that this saying was a joke: 'The USA and the UK are different countrys divided by the same language'. I am an regular visitor of the English eBay.co.uk. And there overyone is refering to the 'BIAS-WEIGHT' and nobody to the 'anti-skate'. So I was once more caused,by some of our members,to
think that I was the only one with just one of those 'anti-skate' weights. So I emailed Tri with a very naive presupposition that I will get an answer. I asked about those (imaginary) 2 extra anti-skate weights. However I am
sure that he is the 'right address' for our complains.The only problem is how to 'get' to him. Well I may 'get there'
by accident so to speak. I got an email from an very kind guy, Paul,who seems to be Tri's friend .So I made my proposal to Tri via Paul. The proposal: we need at least one extra weight that is the same weight as those Doug's 5
or 6 O rings. So we will see.
Regards,
Nandric, I take it that you would LIKE to have an extra bias or anti-skate weight suitable for applying a very small amount of bias or anti-skate force. Any competent machinist could make that for you, it seems to me, using the original "normal" size brass weight as a template. I guess you want this weight because you are unable to obtain suitable O-rings to do Doug's trick. You could also buy some tiny O-rings via the internet. For another reason, I recently bought some from a company called "All O-rings". You might Google it. McMaster Carr, a hardware supplier based in the US, may also carry O-rings. They sell just about anything else under the sun.
Dear Lewm,You 'dwell (about the things)just before sleep' and are 'much smarter then'(08.17.09).
The total opposite was the case with me.I was wrestling with just one thougth and was not able to sleep at all. I am reluctant to say this but the Triplanar VII cost 5000 Euro in Europe and I thought that my 'specimen' was incomplete but also that I had some kind of 'human right' to all the 'bias-weights' that others had. One thought can
hardly qualify as 'reasoning' but probable well as 'obsession'.
I am ok now and even the O rings are on the way but I still
think that such an expensive tonarm should have more of those weights. Bisides why should I mess with 'Rings'(I hate Wagner,btw) 'on' this kind of tonearm?
Regards,
I spoke to Tri about what was the right Anti-Skate setting on the arm and his response is that there is no standard, no means of knowing what the right setting without audition, and that different cartridges seemed to have vastly different settings... He also mentioned that he himself was not a fan of lots of anti-skate and tended not to use it in his own system. But he conceded that might have a lot to do with the cartridge he is running.