Rega P25, would it sound better than my CDP?

Rega bashing? Nah...Get Ray Barreto's "Acid" on Fania virgin vinyl LP and CD versions--and find out for yourself. Don't be afraid! "Acid" is a Fania crossover album so you might be able to take it better than *hardcore* salsa. The recording is good enough to do critical comparisons between power cords and Lak can verify this fact. He also liked the album (he's never heard hardcore Barreto...we'll leave it there).

I'd rather listen to CD on my Dan Wright modded belt drive transport than LP on a lesser belt drive. In my system vinyl and CD sound as close to each other as possible. I've achieved this goal by compensating the weaknesses of each format. That will get them closer to the performance.

With psychic power and primal intensity,

My rather opinionated take:

The cd player will sound less "open" than the properly setup P25 thereby making the cd sound dull in comparison. Call that distortion or whatever, it just sounds better.

PRAT will be good on the table. Regas excel at this. Better PRAT than a cd player? I might actually agree with what's his name on this one. But it will still sound dull because it will sound boxed in when compared to the P25.

Pitch stability will not be as good as the cd. An aftermarket power supply will work wonders on a P25 and also improve soundstage depth.

Separation of instruments in the soundstage will be more noticeable with the P25.

The lp will be noisier but you likely will find that you don't really listen to this.

All things considered, the P25 will sound better if you have it setup correctly.

Lastly, the idea that you should stick with the cd player if you don't have a vinyl collection is erroneous. Maybe if you're 90 years old, sure. All that matters is if you have used vinyl shops close to you. I started with less than 100 lps.

"the idea that you should stick with the cd player if you don't have a vinyl collection is erroneous".

It depends. If you are going to drop $2000 on an LP playback system then that $2000 could seriously upgrade your CD playback, or purchase a lot of new and used CDs. If you have a $1000 CD player then you could upgrade to a $2000 player and have $1000 left over for more CDs.

This is really a personal decision with no right or wrong answer. Personally I would not stray into vinyl if I didn't already have a bunch of LPs. Used vinyl can be quite affordable, but the quality is something of a crapshoot, and you can't always get the titles you want. New vinyl is just way too expensive for me.

LPs are fun, turntables look cool, but I'm really not convinced they offer any significant sonic improvement over a good modern CD player.

>>LPs are fun, turntables look cool, but I'm really not convinced they offer any significant sonic improvement over a good modern CD player.<<

I'm convinced.

Well, I did it, I got everything yesturday. Here are my thoughts:

DIGITAL:- I'm getting a MUCH wider soundstage although thin. I can here a little more detail, instruments are a little more pronounced. Although that can be due to the wider soundstage.

ANALOG:- Vocals sound way better and more natural with a fuller body. I'm getting an incredible warmth in the sound that is surrounding me. My CDP may have a wider soundstage but it doesn't surround me where as the Vinyl does. Also the vinyl seems to have a tiny bit more imediacy.

Basically, the only thing Digital has over Vinyl is a wider soundstgae and more resolution to detail. Highhats are more pronounced as well as little tiny nuances that I just dont hear with Vinyl.

Is this about normal, should CD have more detail and wider but thin soundstage. Are you guys finding this as well. Please speak up, I would greatly appreciate it.

BTW- To do the comparisons I used the same albums that I had both on vinyl and CD:

Micheal Jackson "BAD"
Sade
Heart "Magic Man"
Led Zeppelin II

The equipment is:
Rega P25 w/RB600
Benz ACE Medium
Trichord Dino and Dino PSU

Please let me know your thoughts on the detail issue