Fella's,I really could care less about "The World's Best",which never lasts long anyway!I think my best interests(I simply would be amazed if ANYONE took my listening comments as anything other than a "hobbyist" opinion)would be served by simply,and logically seeing if what I hear,on program material I know,is reproduced convincingly!That would tell me all I need to know.
As far as Salvatore goes,though I love the guy,he is dead wrong(to me,and my listening friends)on so many of his LP preferences(EX_The Prince Of The Pagodas,he far prefers the Dutch pressing to the English.I have both,as do my pals.The British pressing obliterates the Dutch,and I trust Sid Marks' opinion,a friend,over Arthur,any time.Sorry!!!)that I can only conclude his system is voiced in a polar opposite to me.
As far as a cartridge shootout goes,with me bringing mine anywhere,though I'm happy to get together with some really decent and wonderful folks,like many here,I'm such a fanatic about anyone else touching my stuff,that I'd be considered "Too nuts to associate with",if that came to be.I'll quit as of now,with some poster's maybe liking me,a little(I think)!!
I have finished having an extensive listening of the UNIVERSE,as of now,over a six hour listening session,with two WONDERFUL fellow hobbyists.It was CLEARLY obvious to me that the system is going to be ABSOLUTELY SOTA,with a bit more "FOTZING" around(I really do feel sorry for the owner's back),though I was left with the initial impression that it will be "Scary Good",at a future point.This owner has a superb "FEEL" for what he is doing,and a really good(and decent friend,as well as a really nice person)helping of a second set of good ears.
Truthfully nothing I heard left me thinking the UNIV was anything less than a FABULOUS design,as inner detailings and extremely subtle detail was SO obvious to hear.Also,with every little tweak/change(EX-comparing clamps,different motors,diff amps,etc)there was a significant diff in perspective,and tonal shift.I would have NO problem owning one,so,to me,the argument IS OVER!!
I did have one BIG problem(reinforcing my previous response to a 2.2 criticism,but not my wrongful "POST's tone).To me,the original set up of the Graham 2.2,used in the system,was apparently viewed,by all listeners,as correctly done,by a highly regarded industry person.That surely IS the case,but again,to ME ONLY,his set-up of the 2.2 left a GLARING error in the anti skate.I heard it both ways,and far preferred to have the ORIGINAL MANUFACTURER'S set up abided by.With a revoicing done to the way that arm was DESIGNED.This is common sense,yet the original set-up man has apparently such an "aura" that the anti skate setting was not voiced to where it REALLY should be.I've tested it,and the orig designer knows his product,and it IS accurate,to a far greater point to where it was set,here!!Sorry!
SO,now that I've got myself in some trouble,for exposing myself,I'll let you in on the REALLY important outcome,to me.Even with a setting I KNOW to be off,the UNIV was simply AMAZING.This in a set-up not yet finished,and in a setting that is NOT correct(sorry),for maximum performance from the 2.2.To me,this tells me two things.Firstly the UNIV is a friggin good design,and secondly,I have a sneaky suspicion the owner will "snap out of his hypnotic aura" of the original set-up person,and begin to realize the true,and apparently hidden potential,of the 2.2.An arm which will be,most likely(MAYBE), bettered in this,two arm,set-up soon,anyway.(????)!!We'll see.I think the owner is far too smart,to NOT go more hands on, and question this parameter.
Best regards to all!!
As far as Salvatore goes,though I love the guy,he is dead wrong(to me,and my listening friends)on so many of his LP preferences(EX_The Prince Of The Pagodas,he far prefers the Dutch pressing to the English.I have both,as do my pals.The British pressing obliterates the Dutch,and I trust Sid Marks' opinion,a friend,over Arthur,any time.Sorry!!!)that I can only conclude his system is voiced in a polar opposite to me.
As far as a cartridge shootout goes,with me bringing mine anywhere,though I'm happy to get together with some really decent and wonderful folks,like many here,I'm such a fanatic about anyone else touching my stuff,that I'd be considered "Too nuts to associate with",if that came to be.I'll quit as of now,with some poster's maybe liking me,a little(I think)!!
I have finished having an extensive listening of the UNIVERSE,as of now,over a six hour listening session,with two WONDERFUL fellow hobbyists.It was CLEARLY obvious to me that the system is going to be ABSOLUTELY SOTA,with a bit more "FOTZING" around(I really do feel sorry for the owner's back),though I was left with the initial impression that it will be "Scary Good",at a future point.This owner has a superb "FEEL" for what he is doing,and a really good(and decent friend,as well as a really nice person)helping of a second set of good ears.
Truthfully nothing I heard left me thinking the UNIV was anything less than a FABULOUS design,as inner detailings and extremely subtle detail was SO obvious to hear.Also,with every little tweak/change(EX-comparing clamps,different motors,diff amps,etc)there was a significant diff in perspective,and tonal shift.I would have NO problem owning one,so,to me,the argument IS OVER!!
I did have one BIG problem(reinforcing my previous response to a 2.2 criticism,but not my wrongful "POST's tone).To me,the original set up of the Graham 2.2,used in the system,was apparently viewed,by all listeners,as correctly done,by a highly regarded industry person.That surely IS the case,but again,to ME ONLY,his set-up of the 2.2 left a GLARING error in the anti skate.I heard it both ways,and far preferred to have the ORIGINAL MANUFACTURER'S set up abided by.With a revoicing done to the way that arm was DESIGNED.This is common sense,yet the original set-up man has apparently such an "aura" that the anti skate setting was not voiced to where it REALLY should be.I've tested it,and the orig designer knows his product,and it IS accurate,to a far greater point to where it was set,here!!Sorry!
SO,now that I've got myself in some trouble,for exposing myself,I'll let you in on the REALLY important outcome,to me.Even with a setting I KNOW to be off,the UNIV was simply AMAZING.This in a set-up not yet finished,and in a setting that is NOT correct(sorry),for maximum performance from the 2.2.To me,this tells me two things.Firstly the UNIV is a friggin good design,and secondly,I have a sneaky suspicion the owner will "snap out of his hypnotic aura" of the original set-up person,and begin to realize the true,and apparently hidden potential,of the 2.2.An arm which will be,most likely(MAYBE), bettered in this,two arm,set-up soon,anyway.(????)!!We'll see.I think the owner is far too smart,to NOT go more hands on, and question this parameter.
Best regards to all!!