Re-issue vinyl vs. the original pressing

You can't generalize about this, it all depends on the quality of the original pressings and masterings vs. those of the reissues, with the present-day condition of the source tapes thrown in as a remastering variable. Then you have to consider the condition of the available vintage vinyl and its price. Just because something is an original pressing is no guarantee of superior sound; plenty of vintage records never sounded really good to begin with, and later remasterings can often yield major improvements, although certainly not always. Collector value, of course, is another topic.

I just bought a 1959 Columbia CS 8163,6 eye, in mint condition. I also have Kind of Blue in a 200 Gram Classic Records Quiex SV-P re-issue.

The 6 eye original is outstanding.The Classic re-issue is about 80% of the original.$30.00 vs. $170.00. Is it worth the extra money? You bet it is. The original sounds more authentic as you here the sound in a more three dimentional way.

I am new to vinyl but I have done my homework on buying LP's.

Example: John Coltrane & Johnny Hartman on MCA Impulse vs.the original Impulse A-40. The original smokes the MCA. $75.00 VS.$12.00. Is it worth the extra money? YES it is to me but the MCA sounds very good indeed. The MCA is again 80% of the original.

Do you have the money to invest in original Blue Note, Impulse, Mercury etc..If you do then you will be greatly rewarded with great sonics that will further seperate vinyl from digital.

I prefer originals as well and although I have several thousand that I purchased when they were released or within several years thereof (mostly 60's and 70's), I continue to add to my collection using eBay. Taking certain precautions, I have been satisfied with most of my purchases -- understanding that nothing from the periods I collect will be "perfect/pristine". I buy only vinyl rated mint minus or better -- excellent/very good++ etc. have almost always disappointed. I buy from sellers with established positive track records (as suggested by Hdm) located in the USA. Unrelated to quality -- I don't buy from sellers charging absurd postage/shipping (matter of principle). As Hdm intimates, it's still a bit of a gamble, but I figure I can lose a few bets at eBay prices and still beat the price of most re-issues. My two cents.

Anything mastered or re-mastered by Steve Hoffman, is a winner!

All things being equal (which of course they never are), original, or even close to original, pressings are going to sound better than vinyl re-issues almost all of the time.

I am not disputing you are wrong, just why it should be true. If and its a big if, the reissue label has access to master tapes, then surely there are many reasons why the new issue should be better: 180/200gm pressings
Probably higher quality vinyl
Simply being newer, less degeneration, unless vinyl, like wine, improves with age and I doubt that
Greater care in mastering and cutting for "prestige Audiophile pressings,

If new records are nearly always worse, it seems the only answer is the mastering source, the tape has deteriorated with age or is not a master tape.
Just musimg out loud, but asking why new is'nt as good as origonal pressings.