Acoustat6, Having made a few recordings, I respectfully disagree. Usually an LP, and CDs as well, are recorded to take advantage of their dynamic range, resolution and noise characteristics. It turns out that in both cases it is advantageous to record both at the highest levels possible.
But what is the highest level for solo acoustic guitar and voice, closely miked is different than that for an orchestra or rock band going full tilt. The voice and guitar might be capable of 95-100 db; the orchestra and rock bands can easily do 115 or more. Yet the LPs are cut to the same level for both.
The reason for this is if you cut and LP at a higher level for something that is fairly quiet, you get a better noise floor- something that is readily audible in such simple material.
So if one were following your edict, the solo guitar would be way too loud and the rock band not nearly loud enough. Try your hand at recording sometime and you will see the problem- it really helps to hear how loud things are or are not in the original sessions.
But what is the highest level for solo acoustic guitar and voice, closely miked is different than that for an orchestra or rock band going full tilt. The voice and guitar might be capable of 95-100 db; the orchestra and rock bands can easily do 115 or more. Yet the LPs are cut to the same level for both.
The reason for this is if you cut and LP at a higher level for something that is fairly quiet, you get a better noise floor- something that is readily audible in such simple material.
So if one were following your edict, the solo guitar would be way too loud and the rock band not nearly loud enough. Try your hand at recording sometime and you will see the problem- it really helps to hear how loud things are or are not in the original sessions.