System Synergy Theory

Corey Greenberg's infamous review of the Vanersteen Audio 1B's. Definitely fun reading:

http://www.stereophile.com/floorloudspeakers/993vandersteen/

Carter9000, yes, the fact that 99.9% reviews are postive now. Sure, if you brush up on your legalize and try to read between the lines you can get a feel for what a reviewer might really think, but that's too much work for me. Too many positive reviews, even when the component under review is broken or damaged. I'm sure reviewers have no problem acquiring second and third samples, that's not so for the average Joe.

It just seems like too much politics for me in the glossy rags. The pictures sure are nice though. :)

Cheers,
John

Just wondering.....are they still selling reviewed equipment on Audiogon ????? Hmmmmm
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Acoustics & synergy are one of the most ignored aspects by
audiophiles that claim their superior knowledge & know-how.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Now in all seriousness,
off course it is important. I think we all know that and try to do our best in that department. Are we successful ???
Sometimes!!!
But with time and knowledge we'll be getting better.
I think..............

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Acoustics & synergy are one of the most ignored aspects by
audiophiles that claim their superior knowledge & know-how.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Amen to that - especially with speakers. It gets my goat when I see a reviewer assess large speakers as well as small speakers in the same room! Then they have the audacity to say that the small speakers are too bright and don't have enough bass! It is as if they have no idea what they are doing. I understand that no reviewer can have several different rooms to match speaker size but then why not choose a reviewer than has an appropriately sized room for a given speaker review?

As for the electronics, it is easy to control when only one component gets swapped out in a familiar system. But then their comments remain absolute! There is rarely a direct comparison made which at least would have some relative meaning to the reader. But I have to say that the American magazines are getting better in this regard than they used to be (Bob Reina has always done a great job with making comparisons).

Synergy falls along those same lines - you need a lot of equipment and patience to try a review component in several different circumstances. Although my hat's off to Hifi+ for reviewing complete systems that they have come across that offer a special synergy. Those cases where 1+1=3 are rare but exist and hearing about them is really cool and meaningful when taken as a whole.

So with all this in mind, reviews are great as long as you don't believe everything you read. Only the general gist is worth retaining.

My final comment is about all reviews being good. Based on my cover-to-cover reading of every Stereophile and Hifi+, as well as most TAS, I have to disagree. It is fun to say but that isn't truly the case. Michael Fremer does a good job of making his dislikes known, and so does Art Dudley - at least of late. And the British boys are great at it - they state pros and cons for everything, which doesn't put any company on the spot since all design compromises get outlined. This latter method is the only way to politically handle the situation since a review can make or break a small hifi company. But none of this is an exact science so keep a grain of salt handy nevertheless.

Arthur

Hi Arthur (Aball),
I could not said it better myself.
If you think about the time and effort it takes to put together a successful system that will be sonically adequate to your ears and listening space that it's going to be in.
And then you read a review that says:

" To evaluate "X" preamp we have used "X" speakers that we just got, along with "X" CDP that we were so excited to hear and which review will be published in the next issue"

and there is MORE, a lot more but quoteing those reviewers would be a wast of time.
Point is..................

*synergy matteres*
*room matteres*
*personal taste matteres*
*honesty of the reviewer also matteres and his/her "Paper"

There is more but that would take this thread away from the original question.