What made you think that you must use a SUT to get optimal performance from the Denon? I see no reason for using a SUT unless your phono stage does not have gain enough to amplify the output of the Denon adequately. If you own several phono stages, as your post implies, then surely/maybe/possibly at least one of them will mate well with the Denon. Then all you need is rudimentary soldering skill to install a pair of 100-ohm resistors for a proper load.
My slow descent into retro MC madness...
OK, I have been reliving the audiophile childhood I never had and have several vintage decks, so I decided I had to learn what I had missed by never having owned nor heard a DL-103. I was deciding between the 103 and the 103R when I came across a few interesting references to the Zu-modified iteration prior to the Dudley Stereophile review. I decided to go with that one as two of my decks are american-engineered modifications of british or japanese standards... Oi, none of my counterweights will go past balancing 13 grams... 150g Groovetracer for RB300 on its way... while several of my powered phonostages will handle the 103's headamp spec of a 100 Ohm load, my studies indicated that a high-impedance transformer was necessary to exploit the cartridge... since I note a strong trend of improvement as one travels up that food chain, Auditorium 23 Standard is currently being burned in in my name... This will feed Quicksilver phonostage, pre-, and EL-34 monoblocks pushing Klipsch Chorus II's, all hooked together with Signal silver cabling and all of which I already had lying around... all to hear a frikkin $150 cartridge as it needs to be heard... Shoot me now or suffer the results of my evaluation against the more sane equipment I had been using before my holiday break... Hoping for some real euphonial bliss...
- ...
- 9 posts total
- 9 posts total