Tonearm compatibility and advice

Doug,

wouldn't the Arc style protractor put the alignment off if the pivot to spindle distance isn't perfectly accurate (222mm vs. 223mm)?

On another note, the Denon DL103 is a less than perfect match to a Hadcock 228 arm, due to the low compliance of the Denon. You may try but results may be mixed. the Hadcock should work better with a higher compliance cartridge. Bill (Audiofeil) would know.

Finally, yes, the Schroeder No.2 can be mounted on a Rega (or Rega style) turntable. Mounting diameter for the No.2 arm is 20 mm for the standard No.2 and 23mm for the No.2 fw (only available with DPS table). The 20 mm version can be mounted on a standard Rega table with the mounting collar supplied with the No.2 arm.

Rene

Stanwal,

"I have two of the ADC bases left over from my days as an audio dealer. I have no idea what they are worth."

They sell for more than you might think. The last one I saw went for around $75.

Mingles, it's difficult to know what is causing your lack of air and spaciousness. Could be the table, arm/cartridge or table/arm/cartridge combo. My highly modded Thorens with modded Rega arm and Denon 103r has a similar lack of spaciousness compared to my VPI Scoutmaster. I'm still in the midst of voicing in this tt setup so I haven't come to any definite conclusions.

Your problem also could be with tt isolation, I just finished up some aluminum top plates for my DIY sandboxes, haven't listened to Thorens with this top plate yet. It did markedly increase air and spaciousness with the VPI so I expect it will do the same with Thorens.

The suggestion for MintLp is also right on. I previously aligned my cartridge on VPI with VPI jig and DB protractor, the MintLp was a nice improvement. I will eventually get around to this with the Thorens.

Thanks for all the thoughtful replies.

Doug, I appreciate your Mint Tractor suggestion. I saw the thread when it unfolded and wondered if the hype was anywhere near reality. I'll take another look. This might be my best option right now.

Rene, thanks for pointing out the mismatch with the Hadcock and DL-103. I knew it wasn't ideal. I was planning to upgrade carts if I purchased the GH228.

Sns, very interesting. I've been spending time at a friend's house who has a VPI HW-19IV, Moerch UP-4 and Dynavector DV20XH. His playback is much smoother, more coherent and spacious than mine. In the past, he owned similar speakers and electronics as I do, so he knows my system isn't living up to its potential. It might be the DL-103. Or, as you suggest, it might be the tt/arm/cart combo. Maybe I can have him bring his table to my house so I can test this theory.

I'd like get some opinions on the RB300. I want to now if I'm wasting my time with it. I realize it's an entry level arm with flaws, but I get the impression from some folks in the forums that it's not worth the metal it was forged with. I'm exaggerating, but some folks really dislike it. When I removed the Micro Seiki MA-707 and held it in my hand next to the RB300, I couldn't help but notice how the 707 was so much more precisely engineered. The craftsmanship is leaps and bounds better than the Rega. It's been out of my system for a while and I forget how it sounds. I plan to re-install it soon.

I want to improve my vinyl system, and I'm trying to figure out the best way to do that. I'm open to considering anything... a new arm, a new cart, a new table. But maybe I should start with reinstalling the MA-707 and getting a Mint Tractor.

The low compliance DL 103 would also be a poor match with the afore-suggested Magnepan Unipivot.