Overhang question


Hi folks, I need your help. I have a Fidelity Research FR-66S tone arm and Ortofon SPU 85 Anniversary cartridge. How to set the overhang with such a fixed cartridge/head shell SPU? I mean I cannot move the cartridge back and forth to fine tune the overhang. So what should I do if I could not set the correct overhang? Should I adjust the spindle to pivot distance a bit so the overhang could be set correctly? Thank you in advance.

Chris
dazzdax
Chris, there are a number of alignment protractor configurations that have inner and outer positioning guides like your DB Systems gauge. One such configuration, the Baerwald, is the classic and most popular. (Others include the Lofgren and Stevenson systems ; they all use slightly different math but look similar in use.)

The chances are that your DB Systems (which I haven't used myself) uses the Baerwald alignment. No matter. The inner position is the one to use to set your combined overhang/stylus-to-pivot distance.

Toby
This issue of the interrelationship between effective length and pivot to spindle distance has perplexed many a sophisticated turntable owner.

Even manufacturers like SME make compromises fixing the cartridge location in the headshell (no slots), and thereby not accounting for varying stylus positions relative to the mounting bolts.

If you can establish your effective length, then you can use the John Ellison spreadsheet on the Free Stuff section of the Enjoy the Music website to establish the correct pivot to spindle distance.

This spreadsheet has a Baerwaald tab as well as a Loefgren tab. I have a link to that page on the Support Page of my website. Frank Schroeder and I consider it an invaluable tool and a great gift to the audio community from John.

It may disagree with what FR has defined as the ideal alignment as many of the Japanese tonearms have ideas that vary from those of Baerwaald and Loefgren.

The archived threads on this forum relating to the Mint LP arc style protractor have a lot of good general information which attempts to cut through many of tho common misconceptions about the relationship between the three parameters: eff. length, pivot to spindle, and offset angle.

I also have a thread on my forum relating to this topic. It's something that's worth chewing over, to better digest. I maintain a permanent link to this thread on the lower right section of my home page - considering it to be THAT important to one's understanding of this topic.

Cheers,
Thom @ Galibier