Vintage Denon Direct Drive Turntable


I have been interested in experimenting with a direct drive TT for some time just to see what all the fuss is about. I would be comparing it to my belt drive TERES.

Does anyone have any experience with a Denon DK 2300 TT with the DP 80 Servo controlled direct drive motor? These came out in the '80s, I believe. The base allowed for two arms as well.

Is this TT worth the time and effort?
zargon
Treehugga and T_bone, As I now understand the operation of a waterjet, it cannot make router-like cuts and patterns; it can only cut the material all the way thru. This obviously imposes some limitations for plinth designs. I would have liked to have been able to create a recess into which one could insert a tonearm mounting platform. T_bone, I am not sure I understand your idea, but I think it cannot be executed with a waterjet. You'd be able to do it with separate layers of slate. Treehugga, at my suggestion, the CAD guy designed the program so that the three holes for mounting the Denon were cut FIRST, before the major central cut-out was done. This worked out fine.
My post of 01-26-09 should be ignored. I later learned that using a CNC milling machine to cut the hole for the Denon would be very very expensive vs using a water jet and probably less precise.
Lew, I was asking about routing, for the armboard recess, inside the main plinth, rather than making a second plinth for an armboard (which should be possible with a waterjet as it could simply be two pieces of the same single slab (a large rectangular with a square cut out at one corner), though small adjustments could be difficult to make using a large block of slate...
T_bone, that sort of an idea for an armboard went thru my mind also. But how are you going to support the rectangular slate armboard, once it's been cut out of the main slate slab? It could be done, but nothing I thought of seemed satisfactory, given that I believe it's a good idea to have solid coupling of the tonearm to the bearing. If you like to de-couple the tonearm, which some people do, it is more do-able. The best compromise would be to use two slabs of slate, one on top of the other. Then the armboard could be created by cutting out a corner of the topmost slab, with a commensurate hole in the bottom slab to permit passage of the tonearm shaft and wiring.
A revovable arm-board would be desirable, I did consider trying to get a square or circular hole cut through the plinth with a lip half-way down for the arm board to sit on, but this would depend on the type of kit used to cut, Given what Lewn said about the water jet cutter, I imagine that the cut-out will be quite rough and the 'plug' will be equally rough if not in pieces so a new block of slate would need to be sourced, cut and finished off to sit the arm in. Perhaps a circular hole would be better, as a conventional drill could be used, and I dont see why a 'lip' couldn't be incorporated.

What do you guys think would be the best type of footer to use under these hefty slabs? I intend to use RDC cones, cups and combi bases. Would a solid 'less compliant' footer be better perhaps, The chap who sold me the Denon suggests cerupucs or still points, but I'm looking for a less expensive solution.