Hi Al,
THAT particular cart actually has no such an issue, as for example a 'Dorian' would have BIG TIME!
But now we'd get close to a make disclosure, which I would not like to do at this point. I'm in touch with the manufacturer to see what they have to say.
I can EASILY use this cart with 47k due to it's damping arrangement, in fact it is rather happy with 1k. (NO MORE CLUE NOW). You might be aware that these days there some are actually some quite fine with 47K.
Next I also mentioned the testing with SUT, which is using as low as 13ohms loading on primary. Results were NOT AT ALL influenced (I'm not talking of scope's beam-width variations here!)
There has been a lengthy discussion on that SUT subject on some other thread, say no more...
If a resonance would influence the channel balance being out by a factor of 10 (compared to spec.) we would see this BIG TIME on the scope.
The only res. as mentioned (~100 Hz!)is VERY visible on the scope.
Axel
THAT particular cart actually has no such an issue, as for example a 'Dorian' would have BIG TIME!
But now we'd get close to a make disclosure, which I would not like to do at this point. I'm in touch with the manufacturer to see what they have to say.
I can EASILY use this cart with 47k due to it's damping arrangement, in fact it is rather happy with 1k. (NO MORE CLUE NOW). You might be aware that these days there some are actually some quite fine with 47K.
Next I also mentioned the testing with SUT, which is using as low as 13ohms loading on primary. Results were NOT AT ALL influenced (I'm not talking of scope's beam-width variations here!)
There has been a lengthy discussion on that SUT subject on some other thread, say no more...
If a resonance would influence the channel balance being out by a factor of 10 (compared to spec.) we would see this BIG TIME on the scope.
The only res. as mentioned (~100 Hz!)is VERY visible on the scope.
Axel