Assume a standard "taco warp" so the warp frequency is 7 rad.s^-1.
Hi Mark - please, what's a "taco warp"? I'm assuming it's not related to female tonearm connectors :) . . . but seriously, while I can't really conceive of a standard shape to the minor warps on my records (for those that actually get played, not the obviously 'defective' sort) . . . just going by the tempo of the excursions, I'm guessing that 1-3 Hz is about the frequency range of most of them. So your 7 rad/sec (a little over 1 Hz) is a good figure, but probably a little far away from resonance for calculating good maximum/minimum changes in VTF.
If the inertial mass were 25 g (say 15g arm plus 10g cartridge) and the warp were 5mm high, the maximal variation would be around 6.2 mN. A similar calculation allows a maximal warp tolerance to be derived for any arm / cart combination as a function of VTF.
But the record doesn't act directly on the effective mass of the arm/cartridge - the compliance of the cartridge is in series. So for the actual change in VTF, you'd need to add a scaling factor based on the cartridge/arm resonance, no? Also, the point of maximum/minimum force in the warp cycle will change with warp frequency, as will the phase relationship between the force exerted by the record on the stylus and the force exerted by the cartridge on the tonearm will change as the warp frequency approaches the primary resonant frequency.
Which makes me think that in most cases, the minimum/maximum cases of effective stylus VTF are unlikely to occur very near the tops/bottoms of the warp excursion, meaning that we're also going to see these extremes as occuring at a slightly altered VTA, the extent of which depends on the slope of the warp, hence its amplitude and frequency. Now my head's starting to spin . . .
The important point is that it has nothing to do with the balance of the arm but is stictly related to the moment of inertia (and the mass of the cart).
Yes, this is indeed the important point . . . but I would clarify that it's the moment of inertia from the effective mass of the arm/cartridge combination, coupled with the resonant behavior of the cartridge compliance interacting with this effective mass.
But the big point with static vs. dynamic-balance is . . . what exactly is issue that the dynamic-balance system is trying to solve? Is it always used as an attempt to improve the constancy of VTA with tonearm position? In the tonearms I've set up, it seems that many are position-sensitive (remove the mat from under the force gauge and get a different reading, etc.), and many are not . . . and this doesn't necessarily correlate with whether or not the particular tonearm has a dynamic-balance system. So it seems to me that it's more in the overall execution than anything else.
