Why is the price of new tonearms so high

Nice to watch from outside things getting settled so comfortable.
Proving once again that all models and explanations are simply - you just have to narrow the horizon of survey and to exclude tiny details.
I'd rather take economical advantage from a more detailed model and instead going into a mission here.
Have fun - I am watching and musing.

Indeed Axel: Klappe zu - Affe tot.
But you got the wrong monkey.......
And you closed the trap too soon.

Ahh, so all along you were putting us off the scent in our quest for understanding. Silly me, I thought it was because you had a completely inadequate grasp of the fundamental physics underlying the phenomena we were discussing.

Thank you so much for setting me right.

Mark Kelly

Well - no problem, you are most welcome.
I am still optimistic, that you will find out in due course.
Just look a little more precisely, a bit closer, what is actually happening while playing a record.
The model you are following is simply incomplete - thats all.
You'll find out.
Cheers,
D.

So now what?
The monkey ran away before we closed the box.
So now I also got it completely wrong, hm.

Meanwhile I enjoy the easier VTF setting, even though I can't hear that extra benefit. (Be nice to just imagine it, and tell all about it :-) ha, ha.
A.
PS: Just changed some x-over components with my mid and sub RCs, and I can hear THAT! (at least :-)

"So now I also got it completely wrong, hm."

Axel, join the club, I'm sure.

Makes me wish I could dump my table. Too darn complex. 1's and 0's are much easier to explain. Just 1's....and 0's???

But then what would I play all those great sounding records I've collected over the years with? It takes too long to convert them to loss less digital.