Da Vinci AAS Gabriel


Hi,
I read the TAS review of this USD60K tt. Has any audiogoner out there any first hand experience with this tt and can share opinions? I currently use the TW Acustic Raven AC3 tt with the Davinci arm and cartridge. Wondering if it is worthwhile at all to switch to the AAS Gabriel tt.
128x128alectiong
Dgad,
if you are not using any vibration platform you may also go for better motors like Faulhaber or Maxon motors. If you supply the Faulhaber motors by Sorbothane you might really hear a difference to the motors now running.
This is not theory but approved by a Raven owner.
Dgad, sorry again - Stillpoints, Spikes and other direct (or via one or several hard components...) coupling devices have nothing to do with isolation from periphery vibration. You just have a different "coupling" to the underground, but the vibration of the underground nevertheless does enter your components and its cabinet.

Static vibration vs. dynamic vibration ? You mean ONE frequency of vibration with constant amplitude versus a multiple of frequencies with alternating amplitudes ?
An isolation from vibration worth the name has to take care of all of this.
Thats why high priced isolation platforms (bench-tops and complex frames alike) are either active pressure supplied (Vibraplane et al) or very complex (Minus-K).

Some Stillpoints under your CDP will of course make a difference due to the relatively low weight and not very rigid cabinet.
The Stillpoint due dampen the groundplate of the cabinet and do - due to their extreme hardness - kind of speed-up the component-born vibrations to leave the cabinet.

But it does in no way isolate from outside vibrations.

Putting your CDP between two fairly heavy blocks of slate will most likely improve the sound even more, since now the cabinet can't resonate that easy any more and if, then with much lower amplitude and much lower frequency due to the vastly increased weight and direct large surface dampening of it top and ground plate.

If possible - give it a try.
I yet have to see the CDP which does NOT benefit from that particular method of large surface dampening.
Back to the original question...You would be improving little and only in certain areas while sacrificing in others...You have one of the top tier tt's now...Save your money for other things, or at least other areas of your system.

Regards...
...... or give a listen to a TT with a different concept. In other words - do audition a TT with comparable platter size and mass, but with a working low frequency suspension. The difference in low level resolution, bass speed, authority and "air" and the sudden lack of "grain" may give a completely new perspective on the performance and requirements of TTs.
Have fun on the journey!
Dert

you give a very vague answer when you state ..."or give a listen to a TT with a different concept. In other words - do audition a TT with comparable platter size and mass, but with a working low frequency suspension. The difference in low level resolution, bass speed, authority and "air" and the sudden lack of "grain" may give a completely new perspective on the performance and requirements of TTs.
name names, what manufacturer employs these concepts? which might I add are at or near the price point of the TW Raven?

guys enjoy the music tolerate the equipment

braab