A Copernican View of the Turntable System

T_bone,

Many thanks and I look forward to finding out.

Dear Henry, if you want this thread to soon get out of hand, the best way is to encourage the idler-, belt- and direct-drive "camps" to start a discussion about what is the "best" drive system for turntables .....
This is a minefield full of personal preferences and highly explosive "sensibilities".
Especially so, as each and every of the popular drive principles does have special requirements to the tt-design as a whole.
Better leave this alone .... it won't do any good to the Copernican view of the turntable.
Cheers,
D.

Banquo363,

Congrats. They certainly make a difference.

Hi Dgob - did you try the sp10 with just 3 of the 616's.
I realize they probably come in a set of four, but being this exercise focuses on simplicity and isolation does it not make sense to use 3 touch points instead of an extra one under the sp10. 3 will certainly hold it up.

Doesn't using 4 make leveling of the TT harder?

I use 3 mapleshade brass heavy foot spikes.

Henry I believe you use 3 tip toes?

Raul did you ever try it with three. Are they only designed to be used with all four?

Curious. Thx. Chris

Halcro, the Empire is equipped with a belt, and an extremely robust drive motor, one that is just about unstoppable. The speed of this machine is so stable that the usual effects of soundstage drift due to speed variation don't seem to exist- its soundstage is a lot like that of reel to reel.

I am of the opinion that a robust drive is what is important, more so than the *type* of drive. If it is wimpy it will not matter what kind of drive it is!

As a result, if you look at vintage turntables, you will see a following around certain models that were better at getting things right than their competition. All of these machines have very robust drive systems too- the Empire, the Garrard 301, the Technics SP-10.

I think this topic was covered elsewhere.