A Copernican View of the Turntable System


Once again this site rejects my long posting so I need to post it via this link to my 'Systems' page
HERE
128x128halcro
Dgob, You might try a laser-type device for assuring that the table and arm mount are plane parallel. I believe such things are now commercially available. I would not completely trust a small spirit level; a large long carpenter's level would be better. That's what I use to make sure that platters and plinths are perpendicular to the force of gravity and parallel to each other.
Dear Dgob: I assume that in both tonearm quality performance is first rate as you posted, thank's.

regards and enjoy the music,
Raul.
Very nice review Dgob – kinda makes use wish you had your sp10 back Banquo ?

I have been using the AT-616’s for a couple of weeks. I was able to make my ET 2.5 arm fit by raising it to its highest point and using higher spikes.

http://www.canuckaudiomart.com/view_userimages.php?user_id=5181&image_id=41263

The 616’s adjustability makes leveling of the sp10 platter very easy. For those familiar with the ET 2.5 ensuring the air bearing arm is level is even easier – laser guided or regular level not required.

I still believe the key to the improvement was and this is gut feel only 75% isolated armboard and 25% getting the sp10 out of its plinth. Isolating and mass loading the armboard I feel was key.

Dear Dgob – you listened to your setup with the armboard attached to the naked sp10 first – it improved the sound sure – but wasn’t the bigger jump in quality getting the armboard isolated and mass loaded ?

Any thoughts on this.

Cheers Chris
Dear Ct0517: I think that you could be right about that " isolated " subject. As you I can't be sure.

regards and enjoy the music,
Raul.