Choose between Simon Yorke S9 or transroto Zet1


I am thinking of upgrading my analog source and have narrowed down my choices to simon Yorke s9, transrotor zet1 and acoustic solid wood reference. I have audited both transrotor and acoustic solid but haven't got the chance to try out the Simon Yorke yet.

Some reviews suggested that the s9 us lacking the highs and lows, can any users comment on this?

Any comment and suggestions are welcome.
soundimage
You have to audition it or not consider it or take a risk. Those reviews may mean exactly nothing. Clearly, you want a very neutral, balanced sound with highest resolution possible. And the rest of your system should be up to the task, of course.
If my Nottingham Spacedeck does not lack highs and lows, I seriously doubt that Simon Yorke does.
I could suggest adding Brinkmann to your list.
Inna,

Thanks for your suggestion. I will check out the Brinkmann as well. However, all the turntables are setup with different cartridges and different systems. It's very hard to compare every turntable in the same or similar settings.
S9 + arm: solid, dynamic, punchy. Importantly, plug & play.

Brinkmann balance + 12arm: ethereally detailed, pleasant, "fast". Expensive

Transrotor "Fat bob" (the one that looks like a pressure cooker) + arm: Ferrari acceleration, good authority (close to the S9), solid.

Another to consider: Yorke's S10 with parallel arm. Better than all the of the above. (i.e., dynamics, solidity, details, speed, authority...)
I have this stupid rule of mine. When it comes to turntables and I am in doubt I go for British not German or American. I could be wrong of course.