Vintage DD turntables. Are we living dangerously?


I have just acquired a 32 year old JVC/Victor TT-101 DD turntable after having its lesser brother, the TT-81 for the last year.
TT-101
This is one of the great DD designs made at a time when the giant Japanese electronics companies like Technics, Denon, JVC/Victor and Pioneer could pour millions of dollars into 'flagship' models to 'enhance' their lower range models which often sold in the millions.
Because of their complexity however.......if they malfunction.....parts are 'unobtanium'....and they often cannot be repaired.
128x128halcro
Richardkrebs,
This is not a freewheeling platter running at speed. It's constrained by the string.
If you measure as suggested, I think you'll find zero movement of pod or platter.
Regards,
Fleib.

I think that we have done this subject to death.
Let's agree to differ and move on to some other topic?

BTW, apologies for misspelling your moniker. Big fingers, small keyboard.

Cheers.

"Whatever" means normal disturbances that occur in the typical playback setting, not f**king seismic events or dog accidents or children running into the tt or etc.

This has NOTHING to do with suspended turntables. Nothing nothing nothing. I don't like suspended turntables, as a rule. What you are thinking of is that in a suspended turntable the tonearm and bearing/platter MUST respond in unison, else you have all sorts of problems. But I am not in any way, shape, or form talking about suspended tt's per se. Are we clear?

It's hard enough to make the point without these exaggerations.
Lewm,
Okay, take away the movement in unison aspect of a suspension, and exactly what are these extraneous sources of energy?
Why is it better if they are joined by a plinth or whatever, than planted on the base?
Don't tell me they will act in unison to some undefined energy and cancel affects, because they won't. I'm saying it's more likely negative affects will be increased.

A plinth or chassis is a logical design for a commercial table, but it is also good at transmitting extraneous energy between platter and arm. I can't understand why you think this is desirable. Heavy pods coupled to a heavy base is more likely to resist this negative energy, depending on design.
Regards,
A plinth or chassis is a logical design for a commercial table,
And I think that just answered Lew's question why most turntable manufacturers produce the 'attached' package.
It's easy, convenient and generally 'plug'n'play'.
But this discussion really belongs on the Copernican Thread which, despite its absence from recent activity, has had nearly 1,000,000 hits so hopefully some readers are inspired to try it out...โ“๐Ÿ˜Ž
As I repeated many times...I'm not trying to convince the sceptics here. I'm merely relaying my findings after creating the model and comparing it to all the commercial turntables I have heard and owned myself.
The only answer I could find to explain the improvements I was hearing...was the presumption that a massive level armpod was perhaps the important ingredientโ“๐Ÿ‘€
I never imagined the hostility this simple mission would unleash....and all from those who have never tried it themselves...๐Ÿ˜ฑ
Please forgive me...๐Ÿ™๐Ÿฝ