Dynavector 20XL-2 vs. Soundsmith Zypher

The Zephyr is simply more detailed, better bass slam and just sounds better. This shouldn't be a big surprise because it is reputed that Harry Weisberg and Peter Ledermann sllegedly collaborated on the design of the Zephyr. Also, the Zephyr is an easier match to the JMW uni-pivot arm. In short, the DV 20X2 H is a nice carty, but keep in mind that it's kinda at the low end of MC carties. I haven't A/B'd the 20X2 H versus the L, but I surmise that the L may sound better because the MC is lower mass. If I had to choose between Zephyr OR DV 20X2, I'd go for the Zephyr.

Hi Dodgealum

When I had my Scout at its best, the performance did not in any way reflect on the limitations of the table. Rather, it emphasized its' strenghs. I had, though, done many things to help its performance. Extensive isolation, 300rpm motor, completely isolating the motor from the table, with the exception of the belt. Other things as well, but you get the idea. The Scout can be made a formidable vinyl spinner, if you care to. But, it's your choice, of course, any choice you make will undoubtedly sound just fine.

Regards,
Dan

DV 20X2 vs Zephyr update. Yesterday I swapped out my Zephyr to get it retipped. I slid the DV 20X2 H back on. I confirm my earlier posts. The DV is a nice sounding cartridge, but it just doesn't have the resolving power of the Zephyr, particularly when I spin classical music vinyl. It is very good for rock and pop -- bass really slams, but even still, the bass and lower midrange is not as tight as the Zephyr. Also, it seems that the top-end is a little "dark."