Kill Top End Extension - All Silver Ribbon Cables


Hi Guys,

I have a system were ALL the Interconnects and Speaker cables are all Pure Silver Based Ribbons from PSC Audio. http://www.pscaudio.com/ Would any of you know, whether this would be a BAD idea, if my current system is a tube based setup. I guess I'm wondering if this whats killing the top end extension in the music. ie. the nice shimmer on the cymbals. I've changed all the tubes on the pre-amp and the Amp is only about 2 weeks old. Furthermore, the pencil valves on the CD player have also just been replaced.

System Configuration
Amp: 13E1 Tube Monoblocks
Pre-Amp - Supratek Sauvignon
CD Player - Audio Aero Capitole MKII
Interconnect: CD to Pre - PSC Custom Pure Silver Ribbons (1 mtr)
Interconnect: Pre to Power PSC Custom Pure Silver Ribbons (2 mtr)
Speaker Cables: PSC Custom Pure Silver Ribbons (2 Mtrs)

Many Thanks to all that reply...
clipsal
Sean, I was fooling around with some 9' DIY silver/cotton speaker cables & would appreciate your thoughts. Each phase is a 4-braid litz weave of four Audio Consulting 24 awg solid wire strands inside four 2mm cotton sleeves. I found that treble response became more extended when I twisted together the two 4-wire bundles representing the two phases (as compared to running the two phases separately across the floor.) Do you think it's worth going a step further, and weaving all eight strands of the two phases into one 8-braid? This would bring all +/- strands closer together and in a uniform geometry.
Dgarretson: Making a twisted pair lowered the inductance and nominal impedance of the cable as compared to running the cables spaced further apart. Since impedance typically rises with frequency in most audio circuits, making it harder to pass signal as frequency climbs, and inductance rolls off the treble response, the steps that you took helped to negate those potential problems. That's why you can hear the changes that you made in a clearly audible fashion.

Having said that, unless you can maintain near identical conductor lengths and a VERY consistent weave, i would stick to using the twisted pair configuration. Even going this route with multiple conductors can be tough. That is, it becomes difficult to control the internal geometry of the multiple conductors within each leg of the cable.

If you are trying to optimize a design using the parts that you've already got, you might want to try going the spiral wrapped star quad approach. This will require using two more cotton sleeves per cable, meaning that you would need four more total.

Use two conductors per leg and stagger the polarities of each leg. In other words, use 2 pos, 2 neg, 2 pos, 2 neg in an alternating circle arrangement. Once you've got the four individual bundles somewhat anchored together, apply a slight but consistent spiral twist to the entire length of the bundle.

This approach will lower your nominal impedance, offer improved power transfer, offer increased transient capabilities, broaden the bandwidth of the cable, reduce EM radiation from the cable itself, offer a reduction in potential RFI susceptability, etc...

This approach is about as good as you can get using what you have without getting far more complex and time consuming. Whether or not you like the end result would obviously be a matter of personal preference. Sean
>

PS... Your aggregate gauge size is appr 18 gauge for the four 24 gauge wires per polarity.
i find the comments very interesting.

i have auditioned many silver cables and in fact probably have a silver cable in my stereo system, namely the sunny cable technology m600 cable.

i have yet to experience a roll off in the treble from a silver cable.