MIT Oracle V2 vs. V2.1

Can anyone shine some light on the improvement on V2.1 vs. V2? Is the improvement significant?

molarmiler10-31-2006 12:29am

nickt Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 172 posts 10-31-2006 at 02:51am Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete I could be wrong but I think they are the same cables. The V2.1 has one advantage: the impedance is adjustable, where the V2's impedance is not. You should just call MIT to make sure. Nick
zenieth Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 381 posts 10-31-2006 at 02:35pm Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete Nickt is correct. The .1 version does have adjustable impedance. This is offered on all three V series cables. I use the V3.1 with excellent results!
unclejeff Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 1,313 posts 10-31-2006 at 04:18pm Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete One place you will not get your answer is at the MIT website. It is horrible.
joeabrams Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 132 posts 10-31-2006 at 04:05pm Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete I'm guessing you're asking about speaker cables, so the question of adjustable impedance-matching does not come up. Oracle V2 was an excellent speaker cable, but V2.1 is more open, has a more articulate bottom end with better pitch definition, and has better over-all soundstaging and holography. MIT never made an interconnect called "Oracle V2." The model prior to Oracle V2.1 interconnect was called 350 Oracle. Hope this helps. Best, Joe