Synergistic New Tesla Line...Any comments?

the Accel and PR speaker cables are VERY different from each other. I preferred the PR speaker cables in my system.

In what way was PR better than Acc? I am currently using an Accelerator XLR between my CDP (with built in pre) and amp.

Hi Hasse, in your last post you asked about my comment "the Accel and PR speaker cables are VERY different from each other. I preferred the PR speaker cables in my system." That comment was about the speaker cables and NOT the interconnects. The Accel and PR interconnects are different from the speaker cable line even though they have the same name. They are made with different materials and only possess some similarities/traits.

An upgrade for you would be to try a set of Acoustic Reference interconnects from source to amp. Going to the PR might be too much sparkle in my opinion. Or even better, I would keep the Accel and try the Galileo Universal interconnect cell. That will prob be your best option. The best place for the PR interconnects is between Preamp and Amp. The best way is to demo both cables and make your decision on your own testing in your own system.

Sorry joey if I was unclear. I am happy with my Accelerator IC and have no plans on upgrading but was wondering IN WHAT WAY the PR and Acc SPEAKER cables are different.

The PR soundstage is bigger and more pin point. But not as forgiving as the Accel. Tons of resolution and more separation of instruments. They are leaner in the bass only by a little bit and somewhat in the midrange but very noticeable. More on the cool neutral side. The highs are much more extended and more revealing. The Accels are a good for regular equipment. The PR speaker cables are reference class. Add a universal speaker cell to the Accel and that will raise it and surpass the PR speaker cables for sure. They will exhibit exactly as the reviews above and also in a recent thread. But will have all the traits of the Accels. Worth an audition!

Thanks again for the input, much appreciated.