Harmonic Technology VS Acoustic Zen cables


Does anybody have experiences with cables from both Harmonic Technology and Acoustic Zens? I have the AZ Reference Matrix's and II's and Satoris and would like to know if they are similiar to the HT cables since both companies where founded by Robert Lee and use the same 6N zero crystal technology.
bjue
Just for the hell of it try e-mailing each company and ask them that same question...See what kind of answer you get............
In my experience, the AZ is better, being more refined and better balanced from top to bottom w/in the same price range. Robert Lee, the founder of both companies. He's the reason for initial success behind both these companies and is still behind AZ all the way.

Kenobi
I use both brands. AZ Silver Reference II for CD Player to preamp. and Harmonic Technology Prosilway III for pre to power amplifier.
Many people recomend Silver Ref. II with Matrix Ref. II, but the Prosilway III and now the III+ is a little better than the Matrix.
Both brands are excellent and both represent a good value for the money. Depending on your system you will prefer AZ or HT.
And here in Audiogon you will find both at very affordable price.
Hope this help you.
I've been using HT exclusively for about 7 years now...Pro-Silway Mk2's from Dac to pre and pre to amp(s) along with the Pro-9 bi-wire speaker cables...I even have the HT silver wire exclusively inside my Sonic Frontiers Line 3(pre-amp)...I've been anxious to try the Pro-Silway3, 3+, and even more-so, the Magic/Magic2. A recent rearrangement and additions to my system has me trying the AZ Matrix Ref 2 right now into one of my amps (midrange/tweeter amp) in order to smooth out the very top just a little bit. Tonight I've reached 150+ break in hours on them via my secondary system playing continuously for almost a week, and I'm about to try them out [in my main system] right now.I might need another 50 hrs or so but I'll find out soon enough. I'll report back.Happy Lissn'n