SR Power Cell 10 SE Vs, Bybee Purifier PC

Husk01- I hope you have the opportunity to evaluate the Syergistic Research PowerCell 10SE Mark II.

Tbg, I understand.

Davidpritchard, I do not have the opportunity to audition products before I buy because I live abroad. I have read that the Mark II is better then the non-Mark II. I would expect it to be with 4 modules vs. 1 module for the non-Mark II. I have the non-Mark II -- but with the newer PC that has the G-07 plug/IEC and the 2 Enigma bullets which make a big difference in my system that is highly resolving.

The SR with the Bybee added downstream is a whole other ballgame. I would be surprised if you took the non-Mark II and added the Mark II downstream that the results would be superior. Just speculation on my part.

Sabai, all that I can really say is that the Mk II is clearly better than original SE 10. I'm in a very perplexing situation where my BMC gear, especially the M1 amps, do not like any conditioner or filter before them. I had the Sound Application SA-1 filter and found it outstanding on all equipment except the BMC gear. I like the BMC gear, so right now I am using a filter only on my digital gear, including the computer.

Tbg, have you tried any Bybee products in your system? A Bybee Quantum Force or an Ultra SE PC might do the trick, IMHO. I run a lot of Bybee products in series -- with ICs and SCs and PCs -- and they have never disappointed me.

Many years ago I had the Bybee ic filters. When I took them out of my system the sound improved. So for about the last eight years I have ignored all of his stuff.