jrn
Yes, but there can be two reasons for that. One is that it sounded better/different/worse because of an actual audible difference brought about by the item in question, and the other is that there was no actual audible difference and it sounded better/different/worse for purely psychological reasons, i.e. what some would generally refer to as the placebo effect.
So, when a company claims their product "works," which of those two possibilities do they have in mind?
Judging by much of the marketing, there seems to be a rather heavy implication of the former.
Simply q , "works" means it musically sounds better or more pleasing in your system. You have to have that defined,...really? When it does not work it simply means whatever you changed makes it sound not as musically pleasing.
Yes, but there can be two reasons for that. One is that it sounded better/different/worse because of an actual audible difference brought about by the item in question, and the other is that there was no actual audible difference and it sounded better/different/worse for purely psychological reasons, i.e. what some would generally refer to as the placebo effect.
So, when a company claims their product "works," which of those two possibilities do they have in mind?
Judging by much of the marketing, there seems to be a rather heavy implication of the former.